Literature DB >> 12153999

Genetic predisposition to low bone mass is paralleled by an enhanced sensitivity to signals anabolic to the skeleton.

Stefan Judex1, Leah-Rae Donahue, Clinton Rubin.   

Abstract

The structure of the adult skeleton is determined, in large part, by its genome. Whether genetic variations may influence the effectiveness of interventions to combat skeletal diseases remains unknown. The differential response of trabecular bone to an anabolic (low-level mechanical vibration) and a catabolic (disuse) mechanical stimulus were evaluated in three strains of adult mice. In low bone-mineral-density C57BL/6J mice, the low-level mechanical signal caused significantly larger bone formation rates (BFR) in the proximal tibia, but the removal of functional weight bearing did not significantly alter BFR. In mid-density BALB/cByJ mice, mechanical stimulation also increased BFR, whereas disuse significantly decreased BFR. In contrast, neither anabolic nor catabolic mechanical signals influenced any index of bone formation in high-density C3H/HeJ mice. Together, data from this study indicate that the sensitivity of trabecular tissue to both anabolic and catabolic stimuli is influenced by the genome. Extrapolated to humans, these results may explain in part why prophylaxes for low bone mass are not universally effective, yet also indicate that there may be a genotypic indication of people who are at reduced risk of suffering from bone loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12153999     DOI: 10.1096/fj.01-0913fje

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  50 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mechanical properties and ground reaction forces in normal and hypermuscular mice.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitt; Ann C Zumwalt; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Comparative vibration levels perceived among species in a laboratory animal facility.

Authors:  John N Norton; Will L Kinard; Randall P Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Soon Jung Hwang; Svetlana Lublinsky; Young-Kwon Seo; In Sook Kim; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Systems analysis of bone.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

6.  Associations between a posteriori defined dietary patterns and bone mineral density in adolescents.

Authors:  Teresa Monjardino; Raquel Lucas; Elisabete Ramos; Carla Lopes; Rita Gaio; Henrique Barros
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  The effects of photobiomodulation and low-amplitude high-frequency vibration on bone healing process: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Rajaei Jafarabadi; G Rouhi; G Kaka; S H Sadraie; J Arum
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Bone microarchitecture and stiffness in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis.

Authors:  Adi Cohen; X Sherry Liu; Emily M Stein; Donald J McMahon; Halley F Rogers; Jeanette Lemaster; Robert R Recker; Joan M Lappe; X Edward Guo; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Attenuated response to in vivo mechanical loading in mice with conditional osteoblast ablation of the connexin43 gene (Gja1).

Authors:  Susan K Grimston; Michael D Brodt; Matthew J Silva; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Low-level vibrations retain bone marrow's osteogenic potential and augment recovery of trabecular bone during reambulation.

Authors:  Engin Ozcivici; Yen K Luu; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.