Literature DB >> 12153666

British National Health Service's and women's costs of antenatal ultrasound screening and follow-up tests.

J Henderson1, L Bricker, T Roberts, M Mugford, J Garcia, J Neilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate resource use and costs associated with routine obstetric ultrasound and follow-up tests from both the British National Health Service and women's perspectives.
METHODS: Women attending Liverpool Women's Hospital (UK) in 1998 and 1999 were involved in the study. Bottom-up and top-down costings of National Health Service resources using questionnaires and diaries to record staff time associated with procedures were performed. Questionnaires were used to assess women's costs of attending for antenatal ultrasound scans.
RESULTS: Routine antenatal ultrasound scans at Liverpool Women's Hospital cost the National Health Service between 14 pounds sterling and 16 pounds sterling per scan. More detailed secondary scans and other follow-up procedures cost substantially more. Costs to women, their families and their employers were estimated at between 9 pounds sterling and 15 pounds sterling per scan, depending on assumptions about the opportunity costs of time when not in paid employment and costs to employers of women who were in paid employment.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates of costs to the National Health Service associated with routine antenatal ultrasound scanning are substantially lower than that cited in much of the literature. Costs to women are very similar to National Health Service costs. Economic evaluations should attempt to include costs to users of the service, particularly when the burden of cost is likely to shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12153666     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00724.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  8 in total

1.  Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project.

Authors:  Suzanne Robinson; Tracy Roberts; Pelham Barton; Stirling Bryan; John Macleod; Anne McCarthy; Matthias Egger; Emma Sanford; Nicola Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 4.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Authors:  Leanne Bricker; Nancy Medley; Jeremy J Pratt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-29

5.  Preferences for a third-trimester ultrasound scan in a low-risk obstetric population: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Fiona A Lynn; Grainne E Crealey; Fiona A Alderdice; James C McElnay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; Clare Mullan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

7.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).

Authors:  Jens Henrichs; Viki Verfaille; Laura Viester; Myrte Westerneng; Bert Molewijk; Arie Franx; Henriette van der Horst; Judith E Bosmans; Ank de Jonge; Petra Jellema
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Authors:  Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.