Literature DB >> 12152638

The use of three different mesh materials in the treatment of abdominal wall defects.

N Deligiannidis1, I Papavasiliou, K Sapalidis, I Kesisoglou, S Papavramidis, O Gamvros.   

Abstract

Various prosthetic materials have been proposed for the repair of abdominal wall defects. These materials offer tension-free repair and significantly lower recurrence rate. Their respective properties are related to such complications as seroma, infection, fistula formation, intestinal adhesions and removal. We compared the final outcome in treating abdominal wall defects in 56 patients with three different prosthetic materials: conventional polypropylene in a preperitoneal location, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh, and hydrophilic membrane coated polyester mesh in an intraperitoneal location. The hydrophilic coated polyester group exhibited the lowest complication rate and the polypropylene group the highest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12152638     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-002-0054-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  4 in total

1.  Mesh implants: An overview of crucial mesh parameters.

Authors:  Lei-Ming Zhu; Philipp Schuster; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

2.  Not all biologics are equal!

Authors:  B C Shah; M M Tiwari; M R Goede; M J Eichler; R R Hollins; C L McBride; J S Thompson; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Histological studies of monofilament and multifilament polypropylene mesh implants demonstrate equivalent penetration of macrophages between fibrils.

Authors:  John Papadimitriou; Peter Petros
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Huge incisional hernia: A case report.

Authors:  Ehab Elganainy; Alaa A Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2008-10-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.