Literature DB >> 12151785

Time course of induction of increased human motor cortex excitability by nerve stimulation.

Darrin McKay1, Raylene Brooker, Paul Giacomin, Michael Ridding, Timothy Miles.   

Abstract

Manipulation of afferent input induces changes in the excitability and organisation of human corticomotor representations. These changes are generally short lived, although can be prolonged by repetition. Here, we charted the time-course of the change of motor cortex excitability induced by electrical stimulation of radial and ulnar nerves. Corticomotor excitability was evaluated by measuring the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials in the first dorsal interosseous muscle by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the optimal cortical area. Measurements were carried out before the start of peripheral nerve stimulation, and then during the peripheral nerve stimulation at 15 min intervals over a period of 2 h. The amplitudes of the motor evoked potentials significantly increased during the 2 h period of peripheral nerve stimulation. Cortical excitability peaked after about 45-60 min stimulation. These clear-cut changes in cortical excitability following peripheral nerve stimulation may reveal some of the mechanisms underlying motor learning and cortical plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12151785     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200207190-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  26 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability by sustained peripheral stimulation: the interaction between the motor cortex and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Mario-Ubaldo Manto; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles.

Authors:  C S Mang; J M Clair; D F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Changes in corticospinal excitability evoked by common peroneal nerve stimulation depend on stimulation frequency.

Authors:  C S Mang; O Lagerquist; D F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Naoshin Yoshida; Shigeo Tanabe; Kunitsugu Kondo; Kenichi Sugawara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Rapid-rate paired associative stimulation of the median nerve and motor cortex can produce long-lasting changes in motor cortical excitability in humans.

Authors:  Angelo Quartarone; Vincenzo Rizzo; Sergio Bagnato; Francesca Morgante; Antonino Sant'Angelo; Paolo Girlanda; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Improving human plateaued motor skill with somatic stimulation.

Authors:  Shintaro Uehara; Isao Nambu; Saeka Tomatsu; Jongho Lee; Shinji Kakei; Eiichi Naito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Changes in corticospinal excitability with short-duration high-frequency electrical muscle stimulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Miyata; Shigeru Usuda
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-07-22

Review 9.  Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  The effect of electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability is dependent on application duration: a same subject pre-post test design.

Authors:  Rebecca K Andrews; Siobhan M Schabrun; Michael C Ridding; Mary P Galea; Paul W Hodges; Lucinda S Chipchase
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.