Literature DB >> 12148724

Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound.

Karen Drukker, Maryellen L Giger, Karla Horsch, Matthew A Kupinski, Carl J Vyborny, Ellen B Mendelson.   

Abstract

We investigated the use of a radial gradient index (RGI) filtering technique to automatically detect lesions on breast ultrasound. After initial RGI filtering, a sensitivity of 87% at 0.76 false-positive detections per image was obtained on a database of 400 patients (757 images). Next, lesion candidates were segmented from the background by maximizing an average radial gradient (ARD) index for regions grown from the detected points. At an overlap of 0.4 with a radiologist lesion outline, 75% of the lesions were correctly detected. Subsequently, round robin analysis was used to assess the quality of the classification of lesion candidates into actual lesions and false-positives by a Bayesian neural network. The round robin analysis yielded an Az value of 0.84, and an overall performance by case of 94% sensitivity at 0.48 false-positives per image. Use of computerized analysis of breast sonograms may ultimately facilitate the use of sonography in breast cancer screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12148724     DOI: 10.1118/1.1485995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  An effective approach of lesion segmentation within the breast ultrasound image based on the cellular automata principle.

Authors:  Yan Liu; H D Cheng; Jianhua Huang; Yingtao Zhang; Xianglong Tang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Yading Yuan; Neha Bhooshan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey.

Authors:  Qinghua Huang; Yaozhong Luo; Qiangzhi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasound images using self-adaptive differential evolution extreme learning machine and rough set feature selection.

Authors:  Kadayanallur Mahadevan Prabusankarlal; Palanisamy Thirumoorthy; Radhakrishnan Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 5.  Automated breast tumor detection and segmentation with a novel computational framework of whole ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Kai Li; Wenjian Qin; Tiexiang Wen; Ling Li; Jia Wu; Jia Gu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Diagnosis of solid breast tumors using vessel analysis in three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Woo Kyung Moon; Wen-Jia Kuo; Kuan-Ju Lai; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Comparison of Transferred Deep Neural Networks in Ultrasonic Breast Masses Discrimination.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Lei Liu; Kai Li; Wenjian Qin; Shaode Yu; Zhicheng Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Fully automated common carotid artery and internal jugular vein identification and tracking using B-mode ultrasound.

Authors:  David C Wang; Roberta Klatzky; Bing Wu; Gregory Weller; Allan R Sampson; George D Stetten
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Charlene A Sennett; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  An attention-supervised full-resolution residual network for the segmentation of breast ultrasound images.

Authors:  Xiaolei Qu; Yao Shi; Yaxin Hou; Jue Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.