Literature DB >> 12146931

The "virtual focus group": using the Internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest.

Carrie L Adler1, Yosepha Rose Zarchin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was threefold: to investigate the effectiveness of a 'virtual focus group" as a mechanism for collecting qualitative data, to explore the lived experience of pregnant women confined to home bed rest following a diagnosis of preterm labor, and to assess the value of the virtual focus group as an online peer support group for women on home bed rest.
DESIGN: A qualitative, exploratory, descriptive investigation, carried out through the use of a virtual focus group, defined as an Internet-based research method that utilizes electronic mail (e-mail) to unite spatially and temporally separate participants in a text-based group discussion.
SETTING: Data collection was conducted via the Internet and consisted of a series of sequential questions presented by the researchers to the participants via e-mail over a 4-week period. PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of 7 women who were on home bed rest for the treatment of preterm labor. Four participants were recruited from a World Wide Web site dedicated to discussions of high-risk pregnancy, and 3 from the perinatal service center of a large health maintenance organization in Northern California.
RESULTS: The virtual focus group process generated rich and detailed qualitative data. Three major categories and seven subcategories regarding the lived experience of home bed rest were identified: the effect of bed rest on participants' lives (transitioning onto bed rest, loss of control and activities, changes in identity and role, coping and personal growth, transitioning off bed rest), the effect of bed rest on relationships with others (relationships with the fetus and other children, relationships with husbands and extended family members), and the virtual focus group as an online peer support group. Participants were unanimous in their appreciation of the virtual focus group. All participants stated that their participation was valuable and beneficial in helping them to cope with the hardships of bed rest.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the virtual focus group is a useful tool for both collecting qualitative data and mediating the challenges and isolation of home bed rest. Confinement to bed rest at home dramatically alters women's daily activities, self-perceptions, and interpersonal relationships. Understanding the impact of bed rest on women's lives can help nurses to develop appropriate interventions for this unique population. The use of the virtual focus group allows nurses to embrace the technology of the Internet to study and connect women on home bed rest, as well as other isolated and understudied patient groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12146931     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  10 in total

1.  Development of an informational web site for recruiting research participants: process, implementation, and evaluation.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Karen Kavanaugh; Rebekah Hamilton; Susan C Klock; Lisa Merry; Ellen Olshansky; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-reach populations.

Authors:  J Michael Wilkerson; Alex Iantaffi; Jeremy A Grey; Walter O Bockting; B R Simon Rosser
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2014-03-12

3.  Late-term elective abortion and susceptibility to posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Authors:  Priscilla K Coleman; Catherine T Coyle; Vincent M Rue
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2010-08-01

4.  Using metrics to describe the participative stances of members within discussion forums.

Authors:  Ray Jones; Siobhan Sharkey; Janet Smithson; Tamsin Ford; Tobit Emmens; Elaine Hewis; Bryony Sheaves; Christabel Owens
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A promising method for identifying cross-cultural differences in patient perspective: the use of Internet-based focus groups for content validation of new patient reported outcome assessments.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Jan Lohs; Ilka Kuhagen; Julie Kaufman; Shamsu Bhaidani
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Communication of support and critique in Swedish virtual community threads about prenatal diagnoses of fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Mats Landqvist; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Social network determinants of alcohol and tobacco use: A qualitative study among out of school youth in South Africa.

Authors:  Rachana Desai; Robert A C Ruiter; Ansuyah Magan; Priscilla S Reddy; Liesbeth A G Mercken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Conducting Virtual, Synchronous Focus Groups Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Derek T Dangerfield Ii; Charleen Wylie; Janeane N Anderson
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-02-08

9.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

Authors:  Kiek Tates; Marieke Zwaanswijk; Roel Otten; Sandra van Dulmen; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Willem A Kamps; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Development and validation of the prenatal activity restriction stress questionnaire: a Rasch rating scale analysis.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ying Hung; Su-Pin Hung; Ying-Ju Chang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.