Literature DB >> 12142596

Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers.

Christian N Ford1, Elaine R Reinhard, Daniel Yeh, David Syrek, Antonio De Las Morenas, Susan B Bergman, Steve Williams, Christine A Hamori.   

Abstract

Twenty-eight patients with 41 full-thickness decubitus ulcers were randomized to compare the Vacuum-Assisted Closure device (VAC) with the Healthpoint System (HP) of wound gel products in promoting ulcer healing. A total of 22 patients with 35 full-thickness ulcers completed the 6-week trial of treatment, during which time 2 patients (10%) in the VAC group (N =20) and 2 patients (13%) in the HP group (N = 15) healed completely. The mean percent reduction in ulcer volume was 42.1% with HP and 51.8% with VAC (p = 0.46). The mean number of PMNs and lymphocytes per high-power field decreased in the VAC group and increased in the HP group (p = 0.13, p = 0.41 respectively). The mean number of capillaries per high-power field was greater in the VAC group (p = 0.75). There were 15 cases of biopsy-proven osteomyelitis underlying the ulcers; three (37.5%) improved with VAC and none improved with HP (p = 0.25). VAC promotes an increased rate of wound healing and favorable histological changes in soft tissue and bone compared with HP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12142596     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200207000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  35 in total

1.  [Possible interventions in impaired wound healing].

Authors:  S Coerper; S Beckert; H D Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [The present state of vacuum sealing].

Authors:  J Tautenhahn; T Bürger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 4.  Topical negative pressure therapy: mechanisms and indications.

Authors:  Paul E Banwell; Melinda Musgrave
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Negative pressure wound therapy: evidence-based treatment for complex diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Jennifer J Suess; Paul J Kim; John S Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  [Vacuum-assisted closure therapy and wound coverage in soft tissue injury. Clinical use].

Authors:  G Holle; G Germann; M Sauerbier; K Riedel; H von Gregory; M Pelzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Comprehensive management of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury: current concepts and future trends.

Authors:  Erwin A Kruger; Marilyn Pires; Yvette Ngann; Michelle Sterling; Salah Rubayi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Penny E Campbell; Gary S Smith; Jennifer M Smith
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 9.  Evidence-based medicine: vacuum-assisted closure in wound care management.

Authors:  Judith E Hunter; Luc Teot; Raymond Horch; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  Negative-pressure wound therapy: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.