Literature DB >> 12142196

Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization.

Marek Cisowski1, Wlodzimierz Morawski, Janusz Drzewiecki, Wojciech Kruczak, Krzysztof Toczek, Jaroslaw Bis, Andrzej Bochenek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) through the anterolateral minithoracotomy has become a promising therapeutic option in patients with lesion in left anterior descending artery (LAD), especially in multimorbid, elderly and reoperated patients with type C or B lesions. To expand the benefits of MIDCAB concept to patients with multivessel disease, a hybrid myocardial revascularization procedure (HMR) combining surgery of the LAD with interventional procedures for additional coronary lesions has recently been introduced.
METHODS: Between January 1999 and September 2001, 50 patients (37 male, 13 female, mean age 54.8+/-20.1 years) underwent an HMR procedure. MIDCAB with endoscopic left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting, followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for additional coronary lesions and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), was performed in 11 patients (22%) and stenting in 39 patients (78%). Angiographic assessment of graft patency was performed in all patients during the PCI procedure. The clinical follow-up period was 3-32 months.
RESULTS: There were no early and late deaths. Baseline Canadian Cardiology Society (CCS) class was 2.8+/-0.7 versus 1.1+/-0.9 (P<0.001) 30 days after HMR procedure. There were no major acute in-hospital cardiac events. Angiographic studies showed patent LIMA-LAD graft in 50 patients (100%). We showed good quality of anastomosis in 49 patients (98%). There was a moderate graft stenosis in one patient (2%). At long term follow-up, the rate of major cardiac events was 12%. Five patients (10%) developed restenosis after PCI, and one patient (2%) developed significant stenosis in site of LITA-LAD anastomosis; redo PCI was performed successfully.
CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid procedure is a safe and effective method for complete revascularization in selected patients with double-vessel coronary artery disease (patients with type B or C lesions in the proximal LAD). This method allows performance of complete revascularization with minimization of surgical trauma. So far, long-term results of HMR are limited by the results of PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12142196     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00262-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  12 in total

Review 1.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without full sternotomy.

Authors:  Hideki Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Incomplete revascularization: what the surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Dror B Leviner; Gianluca Torregrossa; John D Puskas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

3.  Hybrid coronary revascularization in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Melih Hulusi Us; Murat Basaran; Mehmet Yilmaz; Bengi Yaymaci; Eralp Ulusoy; Soner Sanioglu; Cihan Ozbek; Yucesin Arslan; Sibel Pocan; Ahmet Turan Yilmaz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Combining PCI and CABG: the role of hybrid revascularization.

Authors:  Kelly D Green; Donald R Lynch; Tyffany P Chen; David Zhao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Hybrid approach for complex coronary artery and valve disease: a clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  J O J Peels; G A J Jessurun; P W Boonstra; T Ebels; D J van Veldhuisen; I C C van der Horst; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Wen Wang; Can Qu; Chun Huang; Xiao-Yong Xiang; Zhi-Qian Lu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Surgical pitfalls of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure from the viewpoint of a surgeon in the learning curve.

Authors:  Bilgin Emrecan; Ahmet Coşkun Ozdemir
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  The MIDCAB approach in its various dimensions.

Authors:  J Cremer; J Schoettler; A Thiem; C Grothusen; G Hoffmann
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2011

10.  Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Arjan J F P Verhaegh; Ryan E Accord; Leen van Garsse; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.