Literature DB >> 12141619

Screening for bowel cancer among NSW adults with varying levels of risk: a community survey.

Jill Cockburn1, Chris Paul, Flora Tzelepis, Patrick McElduff, Julie Byles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent and modality of screening for colorectal cancer in NSW among community-dwelling adults aged over 40 with varying degrees of familial risk.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey with participants randomly selected from the electronic NSW telephone directory. MAIN
RESULTS: 5.7% of people at average risk aged 40-49 report having had at least one faecal occult blood test (FOBT) in the previous five years, compared with 18.4% of those at average risk aged 50 and over. Of those at above-average risk (by age and familial risk), 7.9% reported that they had had an FOBT in the previous five years. Around 5% of respondents aged 40-49 and 10% of those aged 50+ reported having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy for screening within the previous five years, compared with 30% of those at above-average risk. People with medical insurance were more likely to have undergone a screening test (either FOBT or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy), than those without insurance (PR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.02-1.67). Compared with those employed full time, those who were retired (PR = 1.45 95% CI 1.01-2.09) and those who reported home duties (PR = 1.54 95% CI 1.01-2.36) were slightly, but significantly more likely to report having had a test. As perception of personal risk for colorectal cancer increased, so did the likelihood of having had a screening test within the previous five years (PR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.05-1.35).
CONCLUSION: We have reported important baseline data with which to compare the progress of both pilot screening programs and more widespread implementation of colorectal screening in Australia. In particular, we have highlighted the need for greater participation in screening for those at increased familial risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141619     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  5 in total

1.  Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Alex Boussioutas; Trevor Lockett; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; Louisa B Flander; Louise Keogh; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-10-26

2.  Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; Louise Keogh; Louisa B Flander; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Sociodemographic and health-related predictors of self-reported mammogram, faecal occult blood test and prostate specific antigen test use in a large Australian study.

Authors:  Marianne F Weber; Michelle Cunich; David P Smith; Glenn Salkeld; Freddy Sitas; Dianne O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Mariko L Carey; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Catherine D'Este; David Hill; Daniel Barker; Jody Simmons
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.