Literature DB >> 12140496

Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) IV: pain measurement in out-of-hospital outcomes research.

Ronald F Maio1, Herbert G Garrison, Daniel W Spaite, Jeffrey S Desmond, Mary Ann Gregor, Ian G Stiell, C Gene Cayten, John L Chew, Ellen J Mackenzie, David R Miller, Patricia J O' Malley.   

Abstract

The purpose of the Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP) is to develop a foundation and framework for out-of-hospital outcomes research. In prior work (EMSOP I), discomfort had the highest weighted score among outcome categories for the top 3 adult conditions (ie, minor trauma, respiratory distress, chest pain) and the first and third highest rankings for children's conditions (ie, minor trauma, respiratory distress). In this fourth article in the EMSOP series, we discuss issues relevant to the measurement of pain in the out-of-hospital setting, recommended pain measures that require evaluation, and implications for outcomes research focusing on pain. For adults, adolescents, and older children, 2 verbal pain-rating scales are recommended for out-of-hospital evaluation: (1) the Adjective Response Scale, which includes the responses "none," "slight," "moderate," "severe," and "agonizing," and (2) the Numeric Response Scale, which includes responses from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain imaginable). The Oucher Scale, combining a visual analog scale with pictures, seems most promising for out-of-hospital use among younger children. Future research in out-of-hospital care should be conducted to determine the utility and feasibility of these measures, as well as the effectiveness of interventions for pain relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140496     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.124756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  8 in total

1.  [Patients with pain in outpatient care. A nationwide cross-sectional survey with path model].

Authors:  M Leiske; N A Lahmann; G Lindena; R Centmayer; R Suhr
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  A consensus-based template for documenting and reporting in physician-staffed pre-hospital services.

Authors:  Andreas J Krüger; David Lockey; Jouni Kurola; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Maaret Castrén; Søren Mikkelsen; Hans Morten Lossius
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Emergency medical services key performance measurement in Asian cities.

Authors:  Nik Hisamuddin Rahman; Hideharu Tanaka; Sang Do Shin; Yih Yng Ng; Thammapad Piyasuwankul; Chih-Hao Lin; Marcus Eng Hock Ong
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  Acute pain in the prehospital setting: a register-based study of 41.241 patients.

Authors:  Kristian D Friesgaard; Ingunn S Riddervold; Hans Kirkegaard; Erika F Christensen; Lone Nikolajsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Intravenous versus oral paracetamol in a UK ambulance service: a case control study.

Authors:  Karl Charlton; Matthew Limmer; Hayley Moore
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 6.  Paramedic assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired adult patient.

Authors:  Bill Lord
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-10-06

7.  A description of pharmacological analgesia administration by public sector advanced life support paramedics in the City of Cape Town.

Authors:  Ryan Matthews; Michael McCaul; Wayne Smith
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-28

Review 8.  Opioids for Treatment of Pre-hospital Acute Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kristian Dahl Friesgaard; Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Per Kristian Hyldmo; Lasse Raatiniemi; Jouni Kurola; Robert Larsen; Poul Kongstad; Vidar Magnusson; Mårten Sandberg; Marius Rehn; Leif Rognås
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-01-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.