Literature DB >> 12137572

Decision making and recognition mechanisms.

Bryan D Neff1, Paul W Sherman.   

Abstract

Determining how individuals adjust their behaviour to maximize reproductive opportunities is fundamental to understanding the adaptive significance of behavioural variations. Such 'decision making' requires recognition mechanisms, whereby an individual evaluates cues that yield information about the potential reproductive outcomes of alternative behaviours. Here, we develop a quantitative model for understanding how individuals evaluate cues. Only when a proximate (immediate) cue predicts reproductive value more reliably than an evolved predisposition, will the cue influence an individual's decision. The model resolves some long-standing controversies in evolutionary biology involving recognition mechanisms and interpretations of behavioural decisions that were observed after manipulations of cues of parentage, kinship and mate quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137572      PMCID: PMC1691050          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Relating paternity to paternal care.

Authors:  Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Kin recognition and the 'armpit effect': evidence of self-referent phenotype matching.

Authors:  J M Mateo; R E Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Studying the influence of paternity on parental effort: a comment on Kempenaers & Sheldon

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Experimentally reduced paternity affects paternal effort and reproductive success in pied flycatchers

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Fluctuating asymmetry and copulation success in lekking black grouse

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity.

Authors:  B D Neff; M R Gross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality.

Authors:  Jill M Mateo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Parental behaviour in relation to the occurrence of sneaking in the common goby.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Certainty of paternity and paternal investment in eastern bluebirds and tree swallows.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Self discrimination in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.

Authors:  Michael H Ferkin; Andrew A Pierce; Stan Franklin
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.897

2.  Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Christopher D Watkins; S Craig Roberts; Anthony C Little; Finlay G Smith; Michelle C Quist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Suyong Yang; Shiyue Sun; Chao Liu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Adopt, ignore, or kill? Male poison frogs adjust parental decisions according to their territorial status.

Authors:  Eva Ringler; Kristina Barbara Beck; Steffen Weinlein; Ludwig Huber; Max Ringler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.