Literature DB >> 12137140

Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions.

Uri Feintuch1, Asher Cohen.   

Abstract

The role of visual attention in task performance has been extensively debated. On the basis of the dimensional-action model, we hypothesized that a major role of attention is to transfer response decisions from targets on which it is focused to high-level centers dealing with response execution. This hypothesis predicts that response decisions for two targets will interact only when attention is focused on both targets, and only when the response to the targets is defined by different dimensions. Three experiments, using the redundancy-gain paradigm, tested and confirmed this prediction. Experiment 1 showed that coactivation of two cross-dimensional targets occurred only when the targets were positioned in the same location, not when they were in separate locations. Experiment 2 manipulated the focus of attention and showed that coactivation can occur even for targets positioned in different locations if they are both within the attentional focus. Experiment 3 showed that this attention-induced coactivation does not occur for targets from the same dimensional module. These results suggest that a major role of attention is postperceptual and involves gating of selected responses to executive functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137140     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

1.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Age-related differences in the processing of redundant visual dimensions.

Authors:  Barbara Bucur; David J Madden; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-09

4.  Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Matthias Gondan; Dirk Vorberg; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance.

Authors:  Moran Israel; Asher Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-07

6.  Visual detection is gated by attending for action: evidence from hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Robert Rafal; Shai Danziger; Giordana Grossi; Liana Machado; Robert Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; James R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Daniel D Thayer; J Toby Mordkoff; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-10-07

10.  Dynamic weighting of feature dimensions in visual search: behavioral and psychophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Joseph Krummenacher; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.