Literature DB >> 12137127

Contraceptive method switching in the United States.

William R Grady1, John O G Billy, Daniel H Klepinger.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Switching among contraceptive method types is the primary determinant of the prevalence of use of specific contraceptive methods, and it has direct implications for women's ability to avoid unintended pregnancies. Yet, method switching among U.S. women has received little attention from researchers.
METHODS: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth were used to construct multiple-decrement life tables to explore the gross switching rates of married and unmarried women. Within each group, discrete-time hazard models were estimated to determine how women's characteristics affect their switching behavior.
RESULTS: Overall rates of method switching are high among both married and unmarried women (40% and 61%, respectively). Married women's two-year switching rates vary from 30% among women who use the implant, injectable, IUD or other reversible methods to 43% among nonusers, while unmarried women's rates vary from 33% among women who use the implant, injectable or IUD to 70% among nonusers. Multivariate analyses of method switching according to women's characteristics indicate that among married women, women without children are less likely than other women to adopt sterilization or a long-term reversible contraceptive (the implant, injectable or IUD). Older married women have a higher rate than their younger counterparts of switching to sterilization, but are also more likely to continue using no method. Among unmarried women, younger and more highly educated women have high rates of switching to the condom and to dual methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Women's method switching decisions may be driven primarily by concerns related to level and duration of contraceptive effectiveness, health risks associated with contraceptive use and, among single women, sexually transmitted disease prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Jessica N Sanders; Claudia Geist; Lori Gawron; Kyl Myers; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The multistate life table method: an application to contraceptive switching behavior.

Authors:  Tzy-Mey Kuo; C M Suchindran; Helen P Koo
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-02

3.  Patterns of oral contraceptive pill-taking and condom use among adolescent contraceptive pill users.

Authors:  Jennifer L Woods; Marcia L Shew; Wanzhu Tu; Susan Ofner; Mary A Ott; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Sexual Activity and Weekly Contraceptive Discontinuation and Selection Among Young Adult Women in Michigan.

Authors:  Susannah E Gibbs; Yasamin Kusunoki; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2019-01-11

5.  Response of sensitive behaviors to frequent measurement.

Authors:  William G Axinn; Elyse A Jennings; Mick P Couper
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2014-07-22

6.  Perceptions of Contraception and Patterns of Switching Contraceptive Methods Among Family-planning Acceptors in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.

Authors:  Yuli Amran; Narila Mutia Nasir; Dini Dachlia; Fitra Yelda; Budi Utomo; Iwan Ariawan; Rita Damayanti
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2019-07-19

7.  Using Longitudinal Data to Understand Changes in Consistent Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Athena Tapales; Laura D Lindberg; Jennifer Frost
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-08-19

8.  The influence of hormonal contraception on mood and sexual interest among adolescents.

Authors:  Mary A Ott; Marcia L Shew; Susan Ofner; Wanzhu Tu; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-02-21

9.  Pill, patch or ring? A mixed methods analysis of provider counseling about combined hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Amaranta D Craig; Jody Steinauer; Miriam Kuppermann; Julie A Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 10.  Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids.

Authors:  Kirk D Wyatt; Ryan T Anderson; Douglas Creedon; Victor M Montori; John Bachman; Patricia Erwin; Annie LeBlanc
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.