Literature DB >> 12136386

The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements.

A Dubrowski1, O Bock, H Carnahan, S Jüngling.   

Abstract

We investigated the mechanisms underlying human prehension movements, by perturbing the size and position of virtual targets. Subjects grasped virtual target discs with thumb and index finger. In 25% of trials, target size or position (single perturbation), or both (double perturbation) were changed 300 ms after target appearance. The experiments were designed such that the kinematic profiles of grasp formation and hand transport had a similar shape, and were analysed by the same algorithm. We found that grasp kinematics were influenced by changes of target position, and transport kinematics by changes of target size; we also found that the kinematics of double-perturbation trials could not be explained as a linear combination of single-perturbation effects. These findings confirm and expand previous evidence against the view that grasp and transport are controlled by fully independent channels. Most importantly, we found that the time of correction onset was not the same for grasp and transport, neither in single- nor in double-perturbation trials. This outcome argues against a holistic (single-channel) model of prehension; instead, our data are consistent with the notion of two mutually coupled channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136386     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1120-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  Validity of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for prehension movements.

Authors:  M Girgenrath; O Bock; S Jüngling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location.

Authors:  Alice C Roy; Yves Paulignan; Martine Meunier; Driss Boussaoud
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation of the precision grip orientation to a visual-haptic mismatch.

Authors:  Cornelia Weigelt; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  On-line visual control of grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Automatic adjustments toward unseen visual targets during grasping movements.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Cristian Pasluosta; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Effects of carpal tunnel syndrome on reach-to-pinch performance.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Peter J Evans; William H Seitz; Zong-Ming Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.