Literature DB >> 12134937

Early and persistent impaired percent alpha variability on continuous electroencephalography monitoring as predictive of poor outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Paul M Vespa1, W John Boscardin, David A Hovda, David L McArthur, Marc R Nuwer, Neil A Martin, Valeriy Nenov, Thomas C Glenn, Marvin Bergsneider, Daniel F Kelly, Donald P Becker.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Early prediction of outcomes in patients after they suffer traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often nonspecific and based on initial imaging and clinical findings alone, without direct physiological testing. Improved outcome prediction is desirable for ethical, social, and financial reasons. The goal of this study was to determine the usefulness of continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring in determining prognosis early after TBI, while the patient is in the intensive care unit.
METHODS: The authors hypothesized that the reduced percentage of alpha variability (PAV) in continuous EEG tracings indicates a poor prognosis. Prospective continuous EEG monitoring was performed in 89 consecutive patients with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] Scores 3-12) from 0 to 10 days after injury. The PAV was calculated daily, and the time course and trends of the PAV were analyzed in comparison with the patient's Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at the time of discharge. In patients with GCS scores of 8 or lower, a PAV value of 0.1 or lower is highly predictive of a poor outcome or death (positive predictive value 86%). The determinant PAV value was obtained by Day 3 after injury. Persistent PAV values of 0.1 or lower over several days or worsening of the PAV to a value of 0.1 or lower indicated a high likelihood of poor outcome (GOS Scores 1 and 2). In comparison with the combination of traditional initial clinical indicators of outcome (GCS score, pupillary response to light, patient age, results of computerized tomography scanning, and early hypotension or hypoxemia), the early PAV value during the initial 3 days after injury independently improved prognostic ability (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous EEG monitoring performed with particular attention paid to the PAV is a sensitive and specific method of prognosis that can indicate outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI within 3 days postinjury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12134937     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  29 in total

Review 1.  Continuous electroencephalogram monitoring in the critically ill.

Authors:  John J Wittman; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Continuous electroencephalogram monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Jette; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Prognostic significance of continuous EEG monitoring in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Lawrence J Hirsch; Jennifer A Frontera; Andres Fernandez; Michael Schmidt; Gregory Kapinos; John Wittman; E Sander Connolly; Ronald G Emerson; Stephan A Mayer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Individual measures of electroencephalogram alpha activity and non-verbal creativity.

Authors:  O M Bazanova; L I Aftanas
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 5.  Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Fabio S Taccone; Peter Horn; Martin Holtkamp; Nino Stocchetti; Mauro Oddo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Franck Amyot; David B Arciniegas; Michael P Brazaitis; Kenneth C Curley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Amir Gandjbakhche; Peter Herscovitch; Sidney R Hinds; Geoffrey T Manley; Anthony Pacifico; Alexander Razumovsky; Jason Riley; Wanda Salzer; Robert Shih; James G Smirniotopoulos; Derek Stocker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Can quantitative EEG reliably predict deterioration from delayed cerebral ischemia secondary to vasospasm?

Authors:  J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Use of EEG in critically ill children and neonates in the United States of America.

Authors:  Marina Gaínza-Lein; Iván Sánchez Fernández; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Variation in Anticonvulsant Selection and Electroencephalographic Monitoring Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children-Understanding Resource Availability in Sites Participating in a Comparative Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kurz; Samuel M Poloyac; Nicholas S Abend; Anthony Fabio; Michael J Bell; Mark S Wainwright
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Acute brain failure in severe sepsis: a prospective study in the medical intensive care unit utilizing continuous EEG monitoring.

Authors:  Emily J Gilmore; Nicolas Gaspard; Huimahn A Choi; Emily Cohen; Kristin M Burkart; David H Chong; Jan Claassen; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.