Literature DB >> 12133852

Factors in fatigue during intermittent electrical stimulation of human skeletal muscle.

David W Russ1, Krista Vandenborne, Stuart A Binder-Macleod.   

Abstract

During an electrically elicited isometric contraction, the metabolic cost of attaining is greater than of maintaining force. Thus fatigue produced during such stimulation may not simply be a function of the force-time integral (FTI), as previously suggested. The goal of the present study was to evaluate fatigue produced in human medial gastrocnemius by intermittent, isometric electrical stimulation with trains of different frequencies (20, 40, or 80 Hz) and durations (300, 600, or 1,200 ms) that produced different peak forces and FTIs. Each subject (n = 10) participated in a total of six sessions. During each session, subjects received a pre- and postfatigue testing protocol and a different, 150-train fatiguing protocol. Each fatiguing protocol used only a single frequency and duration. The fatigue produced by the different protocols was correlated to the initial peak force of the fatiguing protocols (r2= 0.74-0.85) but not to the initial or total FTI. All of the protocols tested produced a proportionately greater impairment of force in response to low- vs. high-frequency stimulation (i.e., low-frequency fatigue). There was no effect of protocol on low-frequency fatigue, suggesting that all the protocols produced comparable levels of impairment in excitation-contraction coupling. These results suggest that, for brief stimulated contractions, peak force is a better predictor of fatigue than FTI, possibly because of the different metabolic demands of attaining and maintaining force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12133852     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01010.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

1.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity over the tibial nerve trunk on triceps surae muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Aude-Clémence M Doix; Boris Matkowski; Alain Martin; Karin Roeleveld; Serge S Colson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of Running Wheel Activity and Dietary HMB and β-alanine Co-Supplementation on Muscle Quality in Aged Male Rats.

Authors:  D W Russ; C Acksel; K W McCorkle; N K Edens; S M Garvey
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Effects of stimulation frequency versus pulse duration modulation on muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Trisha Kesar; Li-Wei Chou; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  The effects of stimulation frequency and fatigue on the force-intensity relationship for human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Li-Wei Chou; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Torque and surface mechanomyogram parallel reduction during fatiguing stimulation in human muscles.

Authors:  Massimiliano Gobbo; Emiliano Cè; Bertrand Diemont; Fabio Esposito; Claudio Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Does increasing the number of channels during neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduce fatigability and produce larger contractions with less discomfort?

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; Bailey W M Sallis; Dylan J Miller; David F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Non-invasive muscle contraction assay to study rodent models of sarcopenia.

Authors:  Chi-Sung Chiu; Hans Weber; Sharon Adamski; Albert Rauch; Michael A Gentile; Stephen E Alves; Gary Kath; Osvaldo Flores; Hilary A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Restoration of Hindlimb Movements after Complete Spinal Cord Injury Using Brain-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Eric B Knudsen; Karen A Moxon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.