Literature DB >> 12133159

Preferences for patient cost sharing among medicare beneficiaries after HMO plan withdrawals.

Audiey C Kao1, Alex J Krasny.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess Medicare beneficiaries' willingness to cost share in order to minimize disruptions in coverage from HMO plan withdrawals.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of Medicare beneficiaries from February 1999 to March 1999.
SETTING: Ten U.S. counties with the highest HMO plan withdrawal rates. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred one Medicare beneficiaries for response rate of 69%.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Percentage of respondents willing to accept more out-of-pocket costs in order to continue their Medicare HMO coverage. Most respondents (67%) were willing to pay more out-of-pocket costs so that their HMO could have continued Medicare coverage. Those who were white (P =.03), had higher incomes (P =.01), and returned to traditional fee-for-service Medicare (P =.004) were more likely than other respondents to accept increased patient cost sharing. Most beneficiaries preferred Medicare policies requiring HMOs to sign longer-term Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) contracts (72%) and to offer coverage to beneficiaries regardless of where they lived in a given state (87%). However, respondents' preferences for such policy options were not associated with the amount of cost sharing that respondents were willing to accept.
CONCLUSIONS: Most Medicare beneficiaries are willing to accept increased patient cost sharing in order to reduce disruptions in their HMO coverage. Policies intended to reduce HMO plan withdrawals, such as requiring health plans to sign longer-term HCFA contracts, are supported by many Medicare beneficiaries, but these policy preferences were not related to willingness to cost share. In light of an apparent willingness to pay more out-of-pocket medical costs, Medicare beneficiaries in general may accept increased cost sharing in order to retain their HMO coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12133159      PMCID: PMC1495059          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  15 in total

1.  Medicare HMO withdrawals: what happens to beneficiaries?

Authors:  M A Laschober; P Neuman; M S Kitchman; L Meyer; K M Langwell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment.

Authors:  K Blumenschein; M Johannesson; K K Yokoyama; P R Freeman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Medicare HMO pullouts: what do they portend for the future of Medicare+Choice?

Authors:  N S Jones
Journal:  Issue Brief Natl Health Policy Forum       Date:  1999-02-05

4.  Medicare's Choice explosion? Implications for beneficiaries.

Authors:  P Neuman; K M Langwell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Will the care be there? Vulnerable beneficiaries and Medicare reform.

Authors:  M Moon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The Medicare-HMO revolving door--the healthy go in and the sick go out.

Authors:  R O Morgan; B A Virnig; C A DeVito; N A Persily
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Access to care in Medicare HMOs, 1996.

Authors:  L Nelson; R Brown; M Gold; A Ciemnecki; E Docteur
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The surge in Medicare managed care: an update.

Authors:  J A Lamphere; P Neuman; K Langwell; D Sherman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Older Medicare enrolees' choices for insured services.

Authors:  M Danis; A K Biddle; G Henderson; J M Garrett; R F DeVellis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

Authors:  M Ryan; D A Scott; C Reeves; A Bate; E R van Teijlingen; E M Russell; M Napper; C M Robb
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  1 in total

1.  A study of the user's perception of economic value in nursing visits to primary care by the method of contingent valuation.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Francisco Javier Pérez-Rivas; Tomás Gómez-Gascón; Isabel del Cura-González; Eugenia Tello Bernabé; Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez; Elena Polentinos-Castro; Julia Domínguez-Bidagor; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Juan Francisco Conde-López; Milagros Beamud-Lagos; Oscar Aguado-Arroyo; Teresa Sanz-Bayona; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.