Literature DB >> 12132049

Pre-transplant positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) predicts outcome in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

U Cremerius1, U Fabry, J E Wildberger, M Zimny, P Reinartz, B Nowak, W Schaefer, U Buell, R Osieka.   

Abstract

We investigated the predictive value of sequential FDG PET before and after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 24 patients suffering from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). FDG PET was performed at baseline, after three cycles of induction therapy, before and after HDT with ASCT. Response assessment from sequential PET scans using standardized uptake values (SUV) was available in 22 patients at the time of transplantation. Partial metabolic response (PMR) was defined as a >25% decrease of SUV between successive PET scans [corrected]. Six of seven patients who did not achieve a PMR after complete induction therapy developed lymphoma progression, while 10 of 15 patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) or PMR remained in continuous remission. Four of seven patients with less than PMR after induction therapy died vs two of 15 patients with CMR/PMR. Median progression-free and overall survival of patients with less than PMR after HDT and ASCT was 9 and 29 months, respectively. In contrast, neither conventional re-staging nor the International Prognostic Index were predictive. These data suggest that sequential quantitative PET imaging does enlarge the concept of chemosensitivity used to select patients with high-risk NHL for HDT and ASCT or to route them to alternative treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12132049     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  18 in total

Review 1.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in response assessment before high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teruhiko Terasawa; Issa J Dahabreh; Takashi Nihashi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-29

Review 2.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of brain tumors: a bridge between clinical and molecular medicine?

Authors:  B J Schaller; M Modo; M Buchfelder
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  FDG PET and risk-adapted therapy in Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Yvette L Kasamon; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 5.  Unifying the predictive value of pretransplant FDG PET in patients with lymphoma: a review and meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  Loukia S Poulou; Loukas Thanos; Panayiotis D Ziakas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Stem cell transplantation in brain tumors: a new field for molecular imaging?

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Bernhard Schaller
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 7.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  Rebecca L Elstrom; John P Leonard
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: retrospective study on the cost-effectiveness of early treatment response assessment by FDG-PET.

Authors:  G Moulin-Romsee; K Spaepen; S Stroobants; L Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.