Literature DB >> 12131209

Virologic response to nelfinavir-based regimens: pharmacokinetics and drug resistance mutations (VIRAPHAR study).

Isabelle Pellegrin1, Dominique Breilh, François Montestruc, Anne Caumont, Isabelle Garrigue, Philippe Morlat, Cécile Le Camus, Marie-Claude Saux, Hervé J A Fleury, Jean-Luc Pellegrin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations, and pharmacokinetic parameters on virological responses to nelfinavir (NFV)-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy.
DESIGN: Naive or antiretroviral-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects were included in a non-randomized, observational cohort study and received two nucleoside RT inhibitors + NFV (750 mg three times per day or 1250 mg twice per day). Virologic success was defined as a virus load < 50 copies/ml for > 6 months.
METHODS: RT and protease genes were sequenced at baseline and at the time of virological failure. Plasma NFV trough concentration (Cmin), maximum concentration (Cmax), and AUC0-tau at steady-state were subjected to population pharmacokinetic analysis.
RESULTS: Patients (n = 154) enrolled between November 1998 and February 2000 started a twice per day (n = 84) or three times per day (n = 70) NFV-based regimen as first- (n = 48) or second-line therapy when protease inhibitor-naive (n = 64) or -experienced (n = 42). Median follow-up duration was 16 months. Virologic failure occurred in 88 patients. No significant differences were observed between twice per day and three times per day regimens. According to multivariate analysis, NFV Cmin and Cmax, CD4 cell count, number of baseline RT + protease gene mutations, D67N, M184V, T215F/Y in RT, and M36I in protease, were independent factors that were significantly predictive of failure. At failure, L10I, D30N, M36I, V77I, N88S/D or L90M protease mutations had emerged since baseline. Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in patients with or without emergence of these neo-mutations. The more discriminating NFV Cmin efficacy-threshold was estimated to be 1 mg/l.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the association among individual pharmacokinetic parameters, genotype pattern and virological response to NFV-containing regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12131209     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200207050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics, food intake requirements and tolerability of once-daily combinations of nelfinavir and low-dose ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R E Aarnoutse; J A H Droste; J J G van Oosterhout; P P Koopmans; M Popescu; P Reiss; Y A Hekster; D M Burger
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The effect of the CYP2C19*2 heterozygote genotype on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir.

Authors:  David M Burger; H Reinier Schwietert; E P H Colbers; Mark Becker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  High variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected patients with a sustained virological response on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Cécile Goujard; Mayeule Legrand; Xavière Panhard; Bertrand Diquet; Xavier Duval; Gilles Peytavin; Isabelle Vincent; Christine Katlama; Catherine Leport; Bénédicte Bonnet; Dominique Salmon-Céron; France Mentré; Anne-Marie Taburet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pregnancy-related effects on nelfinavir-M8 pharmacokinetics: a population study with 133 women.

Authors:  Déborah Hirt; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Vincent Jullien; Ghislaine Firtion; Hélène Chappuy; Elisabeth Rey; Gérard Pons; Laurent Mandelbrot; Saïk Urien
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Practical guidelines to interpret plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs.

Authors:  Bregt S Kappelhoff; Kristel M L Crommentuyn; Monique M R de Maat; Jan W Mulder; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Therapeutic drug monitoring: an aid to optimising response to antiretroviral drugs?

Authors:  Rob E Aarnoutse; Jonathan M Schapiro; Charles A B Boucher; Yechiel A Hekster; David M Burger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Pharmacokinetic modelling of the placental transfer of nelfinavir and its M8 metabolite: a population study using 75 maternal-cord plasma samples.

Authors:  Déborah Hirt; Saïk Urien; Vincent Jullien; Ghislaine Firtion; Hélène Chappuy; Elisabeth Rey; Gérard Pons; Laurent Mandelbrot; Jean-Marc Treluyer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in pregnant women.

Authors:  Matthieu Roustit; Malik Jlaiel; Pascale Leclercq; Françoise Stanke-Labesque
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Age-related effects on nelfinavir and M8 pharmacokinetics: a population study with 182 children.

Authors:  Déborah Hirt; Saïk Urien; Vincent Jullien; Ghislaine Firtion; Elisabeth Rey; Gérard Pons; Stéphane Blanche; Jean-Marc Treluyer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of nelfinavir when used in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in HIV-infected pregnant women: Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group (PACTG) Protocol 353.

Authors:  Y J Bryson; M Mirochnick; A Stek; L M Mofenson; J Connor; E Capparelli; D H Watts; S Huang; M D Hughes; K Kaiser; L Purdue; Y Asfaw; M Keller; E Smith
Journal:  HIV Clin Trials       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.