OBJECTIVES: To describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infected patients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir. RESULTS: The interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level. CONCLUSION: Although performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.
OBJECTIVES: To describe plasma concentrations of indinavir alone or combined with ritonavir, and of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8, and to measure their variabilities in HIV-infectedpatients treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen and experiencing a sustained virological response for at least 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective trial, blood samples were drawn during a 6-hour time interval between two doses at enrolment to assess protease inhibitor (PI) pharmacokinetic parameters, and 4 months later to assess plasma trough and peak concentrations. Safety and adherence assessments and laboratory data were collected during an 8-month period. PI pharmacokinetic characteristics were analysed using a non-compartmental approach. Inter- and intrapatient variabilities were estimated using a linear mixed-effect model. The impact of different covariates on plasma trough concentrations was investigated. Eighty-eight patients were analysed: 42 treated with indinavir and 46 with nelfinavir. RESULTS: The interquartile range (IQR) of the plasma trough concentration corrected for the sampling time (Ccalc) was 116-374 microg/L for indinavir alone and 163-508 microg/L for indinavir/ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly increased indinavir elimination half-life and plasma exposure. For nelfinavir, the IQR of Ccalc was 896-2059 microg/L for three-times-daily administration and 998-2124 microg/L for twice-daily administration. Variabilities were high for both PIs. Intrapatient variability for indinavir alone (and indinavir + ritonavir) was 76% (107%) and interpatient variability was 58% (10%) in adherent patients. Intrapatient variability for nelfinavir three times daily (and twice daily) was 41% (74%) and interpatient variability was 62% (50%). Intrapatient variability was lowered in patients with a high adherence level. CONCLUSION: Although performed in a homogeneous population, this study documented a high interpatient but also intrapatient variability of indinavir and nelfinavir pharmacokinetics, which should be taken into account when interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring. Once patients have reached a sustained virological response, plasma PI monitoring may have a limited impact.
Authors: David Back; Giorgio Gatti; Courtney Fletcher; Rodolphe Garaffo; Richard Haubrich; Richard Hoetelmans; Michael Kurowski; Andrew Luber; Concepta Merry; Carlo-Federico Perno Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: A I Veldkamp; R P van Heeswijk; J W Mulder; P L Meenhorst; G Schreij; S van der Geest; J M Lange; J H Beijnen; R M Hoetelmans Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2001-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Marc Pfister; Line Labbé; Scott M Hammer; John Mellors; Kara K Bennett; Susan Rosenkranz; Lewis B Sheiner Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Julie B Dumond; Melanie R Nicol; Racheal N Kendrick; Samira M Garonzik; Kristine B Patterson; Myron S Cohen; Alan Forrest; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Aude De Gassart; Bojan Bujisic; Léa Zaffalon; Laurent A Decosterd; Antonia Di Micco; Gianluca Frera; Rémy Tallant; Fabio Martinon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 11.205