Literature DB >> 12130991

Multicenter clinical research in adult critical care.

Deborah Cook1, Roy Brower, Jamie Cooper, Laurent Brochard, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, organization, and operation of several collaborative groups conducting investigator-initiated multicenter clinical research in adult critical care.
DESIGN: To review the process by which investigator-initiated critical care clinical research groups were created using examples from Europe, Australia, the United States, and Canada. Various models of group structure and function are discussed, highlighting complementary approaches to protocol development, multicenter study management, and project funding. DATA SOURCES: Published peer review research and unpublished terms of reference documents on the structure and function of these groups. DATA SYNTHESIS: The overall goal of clinical critical care research groups engaged in multicenter studies is to improve patient outcomes through conducting large, rigorous investigations. Research programs we reviewed included the following: a) multicenter epidemiologic studies and surveys; b) technology evaluations of mechanical ventilation; c) investigations focused on three priority fields (acute lung injury, infection, and acute brain injury); d) a series of randomized trials of treatments for one syndrome (acute respiratory distress syndrome); and e) diverse methodologies addressing several clinical problems. The structure and function of these research groups differ according to their historical development, research culture, and enabling resources. Specific protocols emerge from clinical questions generated by investigators or from collectively prioritized research agendas. Project funding includes government support, peer-review grants, intensive care foundations, industry, local hospital funds, and hybrid models. Infrastructure for study management varies widely.
CONCLUSIONS: Several national and international groups have engaged in investigator-initiated multicenter critical care research. The development, organization, and operational methods of these groups illustrate several collaborative models for clinical investigations in the intensive care unit. Common characteristics of these groups are a cohesive spirit, a sense of mission to achieve shared research goals, and acknowledgment that such an organization is much more than the sum of its parts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12130991     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

1.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: robust evaluation and high-quality primary research is still needed.

Authors:  Simon Finfer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  The critical care research networks experience.

Authors:  P D Le Roux; J Cooper; K K Guntupalli; R Silbergleit; J Daily; R Geocadin; C A C Wijman; J I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Towards rigour in qualitative health and social research across European partnerships.

Authors:  Jenny Billings
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2004-11-04

4.  Critical care research in Morocco and Tunisia.

Authors:  Khalid Abidi; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Enrollment Challenges in Critical Care Nursing Research.

Authors:  Mary Lou Sole; Aurea Middleton; Lara Deaton; Melody Bennett; Steven Talbert; Daleen Penoyer
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Workshop report: Developing an international collaborative research network in neurocysticercosis and epilepsy.

Authors:  Jorge G Burneo; Oscar Del Brutto; Antonio V Delgado-Escueta; Armando E Gonzalez; Marco T Medina; Silvia M Montano; Luz M Moyano; Theodore Nash; Gustavo Roman; Gagandeep Singh; A Clinton White; Samuel Wiebe; Hector H Garcia
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 7.  Research as a Standard of Care in the PICU.

Authors:  Jerry J Zimmerman; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Kathleen L Meert; Douglas F Willson; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; Joseph A Carcillo; John Berger; Tammara L Jenkins; Carol Nicholson; J Michael Dean
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Probiotics: Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial-PROSPECT: a pilot trial.

Authors:  Deborah J Cook; Jennie Johnstone; John C Marshall; Francois Lauzier; Lehana Thabane; Sangeeta Mehta; Peter M Dodek; Lauralyn McIntyre; Joe Pagliarello; William Henderson; Robert W Taylor; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Eyal Golan; Margaret Herridge; Gordon Wood; Daniel Ovakim; Tim Karachi; Michael G Surette; Dawn M E Bowdish; Daphnee Lamarche; Chris P Verschoor; Erick H Duan; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Yaseen Arabi; Maureen Meade
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Lost in translation? The pursuit of lung-protective ventilation.

Authors:  Andrew T Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Probiotics: Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial-PROSPECT: protocol for a feasibility randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Jennie Johnstone; Maureen Meade; John Marshall; Daren K Heyland; Michael G Surette; Dawn Me Bowdish; Francois Lauzier; Lehana Thebane; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.