Literature DB >> 12128018

A psychophysical correlate of contrast dependent changes in receptive field properties.

Isabelle Mareschal1, J Andrew Henrie, Robert M Shapley.   

Abstract

Recent physiological investigations have demonstrated that a neuron's area of spatial summation can vary depending on stimulus contrast. Specifically, when the same stimulus is presented to a neuron at a low contrast, the area of summation (or neuron's receptive field) can increase by at least a factor of two, compared to that estimated with a high contrast stimulus. We sought to examine this phenomenon psychophysically by using an orientation discrimination task carried out in the presence of contextual stimuli. We have found previously that orientation discrimination thresholds for a sine-wave grating are elevated by the presence of a surround pattern of similar orientation (with an offset) and spatial frequency. However, when these patterns were separated by a gap of mean luminance exceeding roughly 1 deg, thresholds dropped to the level measured using the center pattern alone. Here, we examined the surround pattern's effect on orientation thresholds as a function of the contrast of the center and surround. We find that when both are presented at a low contrast, the detrimental influence of the surround on orientation thresholds is maintained over larger gap separations. We also find that the spatial frequency and orientation selectivity of the surround's masking effect on orientation thresholds is broader at low contrast than at high contrast. Although the results support the idea of a spatial reorganization of the mechanisms involved in the task at low contrast, these changes are insufficient, in and of themselves, to account for the data. We suggest that additional influences possibly reflecting image segmentation also affect performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12128018     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00099-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Influence of parallel and orthogonal real lines on illusory contour perception.

Authors:  Barbara Dillenburger; Anna W Roe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stochastic re-calibration: contextual effects on perceived tilt.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Contrast-dependent orientation discrimination in the mouse.

Authors:  Minghai Long; Weiqian Jiang; Dechen Liu; Haishan Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Small-angle attraction in the tilt illusion.

Authors:  Ayse Akgöz; Elena Gheorghiu; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.