Literature DB >> 12127697

Thought before language: how deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures.

Mingyu Zheng1, Susan Goldin-Meadow.   

Abstract

Do children come to the language-learning situation with a predetermined set of ideas about motion events that they want to communicate? If so, is the expression of these ideas modified by exposure to a language model within a particular cultural context? We explored these questions by comparing the gestures produced by Chinese and American deaf children who had not been exposed to a usable conventional language model with the speech of hearing children learning Mandarin or English. We found that, even in the absence of any conventional language model, deaf children conveyed the central elements of a motion event in their communications. More surprisingly, deaf children growing up in an American culture used their gestures to express motion events in precisely the same ways as deaf children growing up in a Chinese culture. In contrast, hearing children in the two cultures expressed motion events differently, in accordance with the languages they were learning. The American children obeyed the patterns of English and rarely omitted words for figures or agents. The Chinese children had more flexibility as Mandarin permits (but does not demand) deletion. Interestingly, the Chinese hearing children's descriptions of motion events resembled the deaf children's descriptions more closely than did the American hearing children's. The thoughts that deaf children convey in their gestures thus may serve as the starting point and perhaps a default for all children as they begin the process of grammaticization--thoughts that have not yet been filtered through a language model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12127697     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00105-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-01

2.  The resilience of structure built around the predicate: Homesign gesture systems in Turkish and American deaf children.

Authors:  Susan Goldin-Meadow; Savithry Namboodiripad; Carolyn Mylander; Aslı Özyürek; Burcu Sancar
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  On the way to language: event segmentation in homesign and gesture.

Authors:  Asli Ozyürek; Reyhan Furman; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Do Children Understand Iconic Gestures About Events as Early as Iconic Gestures About Entities?

Authors:  Melissa L Glasser; Rebecca A Williamson; Şeyda Özçalışkan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

5.  The relation between event apprehension and utterance formulation in children: Evidence from linguistic omissions.

Authors:  Ann Bunger; John C Trueswell; Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-11-04

6.  Prelinguistic foundations of verb learning: Infants discriminate and categorize dynamic human actions.

Authors:  Lulu Song; Shannon M Pruden; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-03-09

7.  Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; John C Trueswell; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17

8.  The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model.

Authors:  Lilia Rissman; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-01-04

9.  Do iconic gestures pave the way for children's early verbs?

Authors:  Seyda Ozçalışkan; Dedre Gentner; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2014-11

10.  How Children and Adults Encode Causative Events Cross-Linguistically: Implications for Language Production and Attention.

Authors:  Ann Bunger; Dimitrios Skordos; John C Trueswell; Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.