Literature DB >> 12124690

Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.

Melanie S Watson1, Sue Hall, Kate Langford, Theresa M Marteau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact on maternal anxiety of detecting a soft marker, and the association between anxiety and the information given during the scan.
METHODS: Routine 20-week fetal anomaly scans were audiotaped in the obstetric ultrasound unit of a London teaching hospital, across a four month study period. The study sample comprised 28 pregnant women: 14 in whom a soft marker was detected and a comparison group of 14 women in whom no marker was identified. Telephone interviews were conducted within one week of the scan, at 30 weeks' gestation, and one month after the birth of their children. The main outcome was anxiety, assessed using a standardized scale. Information provided during the scan was coded from transcripts.
RESULTS: In the week following the scan, women with soft markers had clinically significant levels of anxiety. At 30 weeks' gestation and one month post-partum their levels were within the normal range. Women who were told during their scan that their baby would probably be all right, compared with women not told this, were significantly less anxious and worried about their baby.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this small longitudinal study suggest that the detection of soft markers on routine prenatal ultrasound causes considerable short-term anxiety for women and that providing reassurance during the scan may prevent some of this anxiety. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12124690     DOI: 10.1002/pd.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  Indeterminate Prenatal Ultrasounds and Maternal Anxiety: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marielle S Gross; Hyeyoung Ju; Lauren M Osborne; Eric B Jelin; Priya Sekar; Angie C Jelin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-01-03

2.  Prenatal ultrasound screening: false positive soft markers may alter maternal representations and mother-infant interaction.

Authors:  Sylvie Viaux-Savelon; Marc Dommergues; Ouriel Rosenblum; Nicolas Bodeau; Elizabeth Aidane; Odile Philippon; Philippe Mazet; Claude Vibert-Guigue; Danièle Vauthier-Brouzes; Ruth Feldman; David Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).

Authors:  Jens Henrichs; Viki Verfaille; Laura Viester; Myrte Westerneng; Bert Molewijk; Arie Franx; Henriette van der Horst; Judith E Bosmans; Ank de Jonge; Petra Jellema
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  "Motherese" Prosody in Fetal-Directed Speech: An Exploratory Study Using Automatic Social Signal Processing.

Authors:  Erika Parlato-Oliveira; Catherine Saint-Georges; David Cohen; Hugues Pellerin; Isabella Marques Pereira; Catherine Fouillet; Mohamed Chetouani; Marc Dommergues; Sylvie Viaux-Savelon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Exploring general practitioners' experience of informing women about prenatal screening tests for foetal abnormalities: a qualitative focus group study.

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Jane Gunn; Jane Halliday; Robin Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.