Literature DB >> 12123792

Comparison of different antibodies for detection of progesterone receptor in breast cancer.

Michael Press1, Betsy Spaulding, Susan Groshen, David Kaminsky, Margaret Hagerty, Lori Sherman, Kurt Christensen, Dean P Edwards.   

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies directed against human estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) have been used extensively for biochemical and immunohistochemical detection of receptors independent of hormone-binding assays. These antibodies have been valuable both for experimental work and for detection of receptors in clinical breast cancer specimens. The purpose of this study was to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of different antibodies for detection of PR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of formalin-fixed paraffin breast carcinoma sections. The panel of twelve antibodies included two new ones (PgR636 and PgR1294) produced prospectively to be resistant to formalin fixation and paraffin embedding. Fifty-nine breast carcinomas, having known PR levels by biochemical ligand-binding assay, were used to prepare multitumor paraffin-embedded tissue blocks for characterization of the PR antibodies. Of all the antibodies tested, both PgR636 and PgR1294 stained the highest percentage of breast carcinomas known to be positive by the biochemical assay (95-98%) and they exhibited the highest concordance with the biochemical assay (88-90%). The PgR636 and PgR1294 antibodies, along with one other, PR 88, also gave the highest intensity of nuclear staining, while PgR636 and PgR1294 stained the highest mean percentage of tumor cell nuclei. Antigen retrieval was not necessary for PR immunostaining by PgR636 and PgR1294 in most tumors and other tissues examined, but did slightly increase the staining intensity. The majority of the other antibodies tested were highly dependent on antigen retrieval; only PR 88 and KD 68 antibodies approached the performance of PgR636 and PgR1294 without antigen retrieval. These results indicate that PgR636 and PgR1294 are optimal antibodies for IHC detection of PR in routine paraffin tissue blocks. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12123792     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-128x(02)00039-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Steroids        ISSN: 0039-128X            Impact factor:   2.668


  34 in total

1.  Regulation of the structurally dynamic N-terminal domain of progesterone receptor by protein-induced folding.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Carmen M Moure; Shagufta H Khan; Celetta Callaway; Sandra L Grimm; Devrishi Goswami; Patrick R Griffin; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Transcriptional response of the murine mammary gland to acute progesterone exposure.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fernandez-Valdivia; Atish Mukherjee; Chad J Creighton; Adam C Buser; Francesco J DeMayo; Dean P Edwards; John P Lydon
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Targeted disruption of the p160 coactivator interface of androgen receptor (AR) selectively inhibits AR activity in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant AR-expressing prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Manjula Nakka; Irina U Agoulnik; Nancy L Weigel
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 5.085

Review 4.  Extranuclear signaling by sex steroid receptors and clinical implications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit; Nalo Hamilton; Diana C Márquez-Garbán; Prangwan Pateetin; Eileen M McGowan; Richard J Pietras
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.102

5.  Risk factors by molecular subtypes of breast cancer across a population-based study of women 56 years or younger.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Michael F Press; Robert W Haile; Charles F Lynch; Sally L Glaser; Joellen Schildkraut; Marilie D Gammon; W Douglas Thompson; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Endocrine disrupting activities of the flavonoid nutraceuticals luteolin and quercetin.

Authors:  Steven K Nordeen; Betty J Bona; David N Jones; James R Lambert; Twila A Jackson
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  The requirement for p42/p44 MAPK activity in progesterone receptor-mediated gene regulation is target gene-specific.

Authors:  Lindsey S Treviño; William E Bingman; Dean P Edwards; Weigel Nl
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Relaxin regulation of endometrial structure and function in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  Laura T Goldsmith; Gerson Weiss; Smita Palejwala; Tony M Plant; Andrea Wojtczuk; W Clark Lambert; Nael Ammur; Debra Heller; Joan H Skurnick; Dean Edwards; Donna M Cole
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Optimized Protocol for Quantitative Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Analysis of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  Jacob J Kennedy; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Regine M Schoenherr; Ping Yan; Kimberly Allison; Melissa Shipley; Melissa Lerch; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey Stuart Baird; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Evaluation of the progesterone receptor status in breast cancer using three different antibodies: a comparison by Allred score system.

Authors:  Renata Dalmaschio Daltoé; Klesia Pirola Madeira; Alex Assis de Carvalho; Lucas Cunha Dias de Rezende; Ian Victor Silva; Leticia Batista Azevedo Rangel
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.