Literature DB >> 12122533

Experience with a once-daily dosing program of aminoglycosides in critically ill patients.

S E Buijk1, J W Mouton, I C Gyssens, H A Verbrugh, H A Bruining.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As aminoglycosides show concentration-dependent killing, once-daily aminoglycoside (ODA) regimens have been instituted. Data on experience with ODA regimens in critically ill patients are limited.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the ODA-program in critically ill patients; 2) to describe the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides (gentamicin and tobramycin); and 3) to assess the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with an ODA regimen in this specific of group patients.
DESIGN: A prospective, descriptive study.
SETTING: Eighteen-bed surgical and 12-bed medical intensive care unit in a referral centre. PATIENTS: Eighty-nine critically ill patients with a suspected or confirmed infection for which gentamicin or tobramycin was indicated and a creatinine clearance > 30 ml/min were monitored. One hundred and nine pharmacokinetic profiles were gathered.
INTERVENTIONS: A first dose of 7 mg/kg/24 h of gentamicin or tobramycin was given to every patient independent of renal function. Subsequent doses were chosen on the basis of the pharmacokinetic results of the first dose. MEASUREMENTS: Serum samples were collected 1 h and 6 h after start of the aminoglycoside infusion. All samples were assayed by using immunofluorescence. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a one-compartment model.
RESULTS: The volume of distribution of aminoglycosides was significantly higher in critical ill patients with septic shock than in those without. Consequently, the maximum concentration reached was significantly lower in patients with septic shock. In P. aeruginosa infections the mean (SD) estimated Cmax/MIC ratio was 10.3 (3.3). In n = 17 (49%) of the patients treated > 24 h ( n = 35), a dose adjustment or lengthening of interval was necessary. The recommended dosing interval based on the Hartford Hospital nomogram and one-serum concentration at 6 h was correct in only 62% of all cases. Signs of renal impairment occurred in n = 12 (14%) of the patients; in all survivors renal function recovered completely and no haemofiltration was needed.
CONCLUSIONS: An ODA-regimen of 7 mg/kg produced Cmax/MIC ratios > 10 in the majority of critically ill patients in our population. Septic shock and renal dysfunction caused an aberrant pharmacokinetic profile of aminoglycosides in these patients. Therefore, individual therapeutic drug monitoring is warranted. Signs of renal impairment were common in the presence of shock, but appeared to be reversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122533     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1313-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  31 in total

Review 1.  Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; David W Dowdy; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Population pharmacokinetic modelling of gentamicin and vancomycin in patients with unstable renal function following cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Colette Byrne; Alison H Thomson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Limited effect of patient and disease characteristics on compliance with hospital antimicrobial guidelines.

Authors:  Peter G M Mol; Petra Denig; Rijk O B Gans; Prashant V Nannanpanday; John E Degener; Marian Laseur; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Efficacy of ciprofloxacin in an experimental model of Escherichia coli chorioamnionitis in rabbits.

Authors:  Elise Launay; Nicolas Joram; Cédric Jacqueline; Anne Francoise Miegeville; Jocelyne Caillon; Gilles Potel; Jean Christophe Roze; Christèle Gras-Le Guen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The role of antibiotic stewardship in limiting antibacterial resistance among hematology patients.

Authors:  Inge C Gyssens; Winfried V Kern; David M Livermore
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Appropriate antibiotic dosage levels in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Maya Hites; Marjorie Beumier; Sabino Scolletta; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Matthew E Levison; Julie H Levison
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.982

9.  Revisiting the loading dose of amikacin for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pierre-François Laterre; Herbert Spapen; Thierry Dugernier; Isabelle Delattre; Brice Layeux; Daniel De Backer; Xavier Wittebole; Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Louis Vincent; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock--does the dose matter?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.