Literature DB >> 12120850

The challenge of evaluating complex interventions: a framework for evaluating media advocacy.

Martine Stead1, Gerard Hastings, Douglas Eadie.   

Abstract

New health promotion and public health approaches such as media advocacy pose particular evaluation challenges. Evaluation is important to provide feedback to media advocacy practitioners on how to enhance their efforts, and to funders and researchers seeking to assess media advocacy's effectiveness as a health promotion strategy. The media advocacy evaluation literature contains some examples of promising evaluation approaches but is still evolving. A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of media advocacy is presented. Building on existing approaches to evaluation in media advocacy and on current thinking regarding evaluation in health promotion, it proposes a series of indicators and research methods for evaluating media advocacy at the levels of formative, process and outcome evaluation. The framework can be used to encourage strategic reflection on the media advocacy process, to guide evaluation of specific interventions, and to demonstrate to funders the importance and complexity of evaluation in this promising field.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12120850     DOI: 10.1093/her/17.3.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  7 in total

1.  The role of formative evaluation in implementation research and the QUERI experience.

Authors:  Cheryl B Stetler; Marcia W Legro; Carolyn M Wallace; Candice Bowman; Marylou Guihan; Hildi Hagedorn; Barbara Kimmel; Nancy D Sharp; Jeffrey L Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Media advocacy, tobacco control policy change and teen smoking in Florida.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Matthew C Farrelly; Dana Wenter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Statistical Power of Alternative Structural Models for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Advantages of Modeling Unreliability.

Authors:  Emil N Coman; Eugen Iordache; Lisa Dierker; Judith Fifield; Jean J Schensul; Suzanne Suggs; Russell Barbour
Journal:  J Mod Appl Stat Methods       Date:  2014-05-01

Review 4.  Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.

Authors:  Linden Farrer; Claudia Marinetti; Yoline Kuipers Cavaco; Caroline Costongs
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 5.  Using media to impact health policy-making: an integrative systematic review.

Authors:  Lama Bou-Karroum; Fadi El-Jardali; Nour Hemadi; Yasmine Faraj; Utkarsh Ojha; Maher Shahrour; Andrea Darzi; Maha Ali; Carine Doumit; Etienne V Langlois; Jad Melki; Gladys Honein AbouHaidar; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Unpack the Salt: an evaluation of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership's media advocacy activities to highlight the salt content of different foods.

Authors:  Emalie Rosewarne; Kathy Trieu; Clare Farrand; Jenny Reimers; Jane Potter; Chelsea Davidson; Natasha Darrigan; Elizabeth Joldeski; Sian Armstrong; Jacqui Webster
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study.

Authors:  Tobias N Bonten; Anneloek Rauwerdink; Jeremy C Wyatt; Marise J Kasteleyn; Leonard Witkamp; Heleen Riper; Lisette Jewc van Gemert-Pijnen; Kathrin Cresswell; Aziz Sheikh; Marlies P Schijven; Niels H Chavannes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.