Literature DB >> 12119422

Atm heterozygous mice are more sensitive to radiation-induced cataracts than are their wild-type counterparts.

Basil V Worgul1, Lubomir Smilenov, David J Brenner, Anna Junk, Wei Zhou, Eric J Hall.   

Abstract

It is important to know whether the human population includes genetically predisposed radiosensitive subsets. In vitro studies have shown that cells from individuals homozygous for ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) are much more radiosensitive than cells from unaffected individuals. Although cells heterozygous for the ATM gene (ATM(+/-)) may be slightly more radiosensitive in vitro, it remained to be determined whether the greater susceptibility of ATM(+/-) cells translates into an increased sensitivity for late effects in vivo, though there is a suggestion that radiotherapy patients that are heterozygous for the ATM gene may be more at risk of developing late normal tissue damage. We chose cataractogenesis in the lens as a means to assay for the effects of ATM deficiency in a late-responding tissue. One eye of wild-type, Atm heterozygous and homozygous knockout mice was exposed to 0.5-, 1.0-, 2.0-, or 4.0-Gy x rays. The animals were followed weekly for cataract development by conventional slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Cataract development in the animals of all three groups was strongly dependent on dose. The lenses of homozygous mice were the first to opacify at any given dose. Most important in the present context is that cataracts appeared earlier in the heterozygous versus wild-type animals. The data suggest that ATM heterozygotes in the human population may also be radiosensitive. This may influence the choice of individuals destined to be exposed to higher than normal doses of radiation, such as astronauts, and may also suggest that radiotherapy patients who are ATM heterozygotes could be predisposed to increased late normal tissue damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Radiation Health; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12119422      PMCID: PMC125034          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162349699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

1.  ATM protein synthesis patterns in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  R Kairouz; R A Clarke; P J Marr; D Watters; M F Lavin; J H Kearsley; C S Lee
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  ATM, a central controller of cellular responses to DNA damage.

Authors:  K K Khanna; M F Lavin; S P Jackson; T D Mulhern
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A clinical and experimental study of the effect of single and divided doses of radiation on cataract production.

Authors:  G R MERRIAM; E F FOCHT
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1962

5.  Prevalence of germline truncating mutations in ATM in women with a second breast cancer after radiation therapy for a contralateral tumor.

Authors:  T D Shafman; S Levitz; A J Nixon; L A Gibans; K E Nichols; D W Bell; C Ishioka; K J Isselbacher; R Gelman; J Garber; J R Harris; D A Haber
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Heterozygous germline ATM mutations do not contribute to radiation-associated malignancies after Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  K E Nichols; S Levitz; K E Shannon; D C Wahrer; D W Bell; G Chang; S Hegde; D Neuberg; T Shafman; N J Tarbell; P Mauch; C Ishioka; D A Haber; L Diller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  ATM-heterozygous germline mutations contribute to breast cancer-susceptibility.

Authors:  A Broeks; J H Urbanus; A N Floore; E C Dahler; J G Klijn; E J Rutgers; P Devilee; N S Russell; F E van Leeuwen; L J van 't Veer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Cancer risk and the ATM gene: a continuing debate.

Authors:  K K Khanna
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Increased risk of breast cancer following irradiation for Hodgkin's disease is not a result of ATM germline mutations.

Authors:  A Broeks; N S Russell; A N Floore; J H Urbanus; E C Dahler; M B van T Veer; A Hagenbeek; E M Noordijk; M A Crommelin; F E van Leeuwen; L J van T Veer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Space radiation and cataracts in astronauts.

Authors:  F A Cucinotta; F K Manuel; J Jones; G Iszard; J Murrey; B Djojonegro; M Wear
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  28 in total

1.  The relative biological effectiveness of densely ionizing heavy-ion radiation for inducing ocular cataracts in wild type versus mice heterozygous for the ATM gene.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; Basil V Worgul; Lubomir Smilenov; Carl D Elliston; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Combined haploinsufficiency and genetic control of the G2/M checkpoint in irradiated cells.

Authors:  Erik F Young; Lubomir B Smilenov; Howard B Lieberman; Eric J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on radiation pneumonitis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Cheng-Xian Guo; Jing Wang; Li-Hua Huang; Jin-Gao Li; Xiang Chen
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-30

5.  Neovascular glaucoma after proton beam therapy of choroidal melanoma: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Aline I Riechardt; Daniel Pilger; Dino Cordini; Ira Seibel; Enken Gundlach; Annette Hager; Antonia M Joussen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Lauriston S. Taylor Lecture on radiation protection and measurements: what makes particle radiation so effective?

Authors:  Eleanor A Blakely
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  ATM polymorphisms predict severe radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Huihua Xiong; Zhongxing Liao; Zhensheng Liu; Ting Xu; Qiming Wang; Hongliang Liu; Ritsuko Komaki; Daniel Gomez; Li-E Wang; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Mouse models of cataract.

Authors:  Jochen Graw
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 9.  ATM and ATR: sensing DNA damage.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Zheng-Ping Xu; Yun Huang; Hope E Hamrick; Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes; Ying-Nian Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation.

Authors:  Pamela J Sykes; Tanya K Day; Sarah J Swinburne; Joanne M Lane; Alexander A Morley; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.