Literature DB >> 14631583

[The importance of rectoscopy and colonoscopy in Internal Medicine].

A Eickhoff1, J F Riemann.   

Abstract

The endoscopic examination of the large intestine can be considered today a routine examination in internal medicine. Since the introduction of flexible videoendoscopy, evaluating diseases in the distal colon using rectoscopy has become less important. Anoproctoscopy is an obligatory component for a complete colon diagnostic after a flexible ileo-colonoscopy has been performed. Colonoscopy has improved significantly the diagnosis and therapy of diseases in the large intestine since it has been introduced more than 30 years ago. By introducing modern videocolonoscopy in addition to other instruments, there is today a broad spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic indications available. Specifically, due to its frequency and prognostic relevance, colonoscopy has become the most powerful and important procedure in the early detection and prevention of colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14631583     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-003-0932-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  17 in total

Review 1.  7. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: iron-deficiency anemia.

Authors:  V De Bosset; J J Gonvers; B Burnand; R W Dubois; J P Vader; F Froehlich
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  [Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection in an asymptomatic population--prevention in patients at risk--endoscopic diagnosis, therapy and after-care of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology].

Authors:  W Schmiegel; G Adler; P Frühmorgen; U Fölsch; U Graeven; P Layer; S Petrasch; R Porschen; C Pox; T Sauerbruch; H J Schmoll; M Zeitz
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The diagnostic and therapeutic roles of colonoscopy: a review.

Authors:  E H Huang; J M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of a new three-dimensional magnetic imaging system for use during colonoscopy.

Authors:  K Wehrmann; P Frühmorgen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D K Rex; T F Imperiale; V Portish
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 8.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M J O'Brien; M N Ho; L Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; J Bond; M Schapiro; E T Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.