Literature DB >> 12118817

Categorization and analysis of pain and activity in patients with low back pain using a neural network technique.

John J Liszka-Hackzell1, David P Martin.   

Abstract

Low back pain represents a significant medical problem, both in its prevalence and its cost to society. Most episodes of acute low back pain resolve without significant long-term functional impact. However, a minority of patients experience extended chronic pain and disability. In this paper, we have explored new techniques of patient assessment that may prospectively identify this minority ofpatients at risk of developing poor outcomes. We studied 15 patients with acute low back pain and 25 patients with chronic low back pain over 4 month's time. Patients monitored their pain and activity levels continuously over the first 3 weeks. Pain and functional status were assessed at baseline and at 3 weeks following enrollment. Follow-up assessment of functional status and progress were performed at 2 and 4 months. The pain and activity levels were categorized using a self-organizing-map neural network. A back-propagation neural network was trained with the categorization and outcome data. There was a good correlation between the true and predicted values for general health (r = 0.96, p < 0.01) and mental health (r = 0.80, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found if activity and pain data were not entered into the analysis. Our results show that neural network techniques can be applied effectively to categorizing patients with acute and chronic low back pain. It is our hope that future research will allow these categorizations to be tied to prognostic and therapeutic decisions in patients who present with episodes of back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118817     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015820804859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  7 in total

Review 1.  Low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; J N Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Automatic sleep/wake identification from wrist activity.

Authors:  R J Cole; D F Kripke; W Gruen; D J Mullaney; J C Gillin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Acute myocardial infarction detected in the 12-lead ECG by artificial neural networks.

Authors:  B Hedén; H Ohlin; R Rittner; L Edenbrandt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-09-16       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Analytical methods to differentiate similar electroencephalographic spectra: neural network and discriminant analysis.

Authors:  R A Veselis; R Reinsel; M Wronski
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-09

Review 5.  Artificial neural networks for decision support in clinical medicine.

Authors:  J J Forsström; K J Dalton
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.709

6.  Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures.

Authors:  S M Patterson; D S Krantz; L C Montgomery; P A Deuster; S M Hedges; L E Nebel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Prediction of low back pain with two expert systems.

Authors:  Murat Sari; Eyyup Gulbandilar; Ali Cimbiz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 3.  The application of biomedical engineering techniques to the diagnosis and management of tropical diseases: a review.

Authors:  Fatimah Ibrahim; Tzer Hwai Gilbert Thio; Tarig Faisal; Michael Neuman
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

5.  A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-04-24

6.  Mathematical and Computational Models for Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Victoria Ashley Lang; Torbjörn Lundh; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.