Literature DB >> 8541025

Artificial neural networks for decision support in clinical medicine.

J J Forsström1, K J Dalton.   

Abstract

Connectionist models such as neural networks are alternatives to linear, parametric statistical methods. Neural networks are computer-based pattern recognition methods with loose similarities with the nervous system. Individual variables of the network, usually called 'neurones', can receive inhibitory and excitatory inputs from other neurones. The networks can define relationships among input data that are not apparent when using other approaches, and they can use these relationships to improve accuracy. Thus, neural nets have substantial power to recognize patterns even in complex datasets. Neural network methodology has outperformed classical statistical methods in cases where the input variables are interrelated. Because clinical measurements usually derive from multiple interrelated systems it is evident that neural networks might be more accurate than classical methods in multivariate analysis of clinical data. This paper reviews the use of neural networks in medical decision support. A short introduction to the basics of neural networks is given, and some practical issues in applying the networks are highlighted. The current use of neural networks in image analysis, signal processing and laboratory medicine is reviewed. It is concluded that neural networks have an important role in image analysis and in signal processing. However, further studies are needed to determine the value of neural networks in the analysis of laboratory data.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8541025     DOI: 10.3109/07853899509002462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  24 in total

1.  Analysis of the information content in Sonoclot data and reconstruction of coagulation test variables.

Authors:  Jan John Liszka-Hackzell; Gustaf Ekback
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Artificial neural networks for assessing the risk of urinary calcium stone among men.

Authors:  Bertrand Dussol; Jean-Michel Verdier; Jean-Marc Le Goff; Patrice Berthezene; Yvon Berland
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-01-06

3.  Correlation between anatomical findings and symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse using an artificial neural network analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Salvatore; Maurizio Serati; Gabriele Siesto; Elena Cattoni; Mara Zanirato; Marco Torella
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Prediction of low back pain with two expert systems.

Authors:  Murat Sari; Eyyup Gulbandilar; Ali Cimbiz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Intersubject and interswallow variability in topography of esophageal motility.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Alrakawi; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Artificial neural network for risk assessment in preterm neonates.

Authors:  B Zernikow; K Holtmannspoetter; E Michel; W Pielemeier; F Hornschuh; A Westermann; K H Hennecke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Toward implementation of artificial neural networks that "really work".

Authors:  M A Leon; J Keller
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

8.  Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  A Cucchetti; M Vivarelli; N D Heaton; S Phillips; F Piscaglia; L Bolondi; G La Barba; M R Foxton; M Rela; J O'Grady; A D Pinna
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Models for prediction of mortality from cirrhosis with special reference to artificial neural network: a critical review.

Authors:  Uday Chand Ghoshal; Ananya Das
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Artificial neural network to predict skeletal metastasis in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jainn-Shiun Chiu; Yuh-Feng Wang; Yu-Cheih Su; Ling-Huei Wei; Jian-Guo Liao; Yu-Chuan Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.