Literature DB >> 12118345

Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis.

Konstantinos A Filis1, Frank R Arko, Bonnie L Johnson, Iraklis I Pipinos, E John Harris, Cornelius Olcott, Christopher K Zarins.   

Abstract

Duplex ultrasound scan (DUS) criteria for grading >50% carotid artery stenosis is typically divided into broad categories such as 50-79% stenosis, 80-99% stenosis, and occlusion. The purpose of this study is to validate DUS criteria for stratifying 50 to 100% carotid stenosis into 10% intervals using digital substraction cerebral angiography (DSCA) as the standard of comparison. Between 1996 and 2001, 163 patients were evaluated with duplex ultrasound and angiography. A total of 326 carotid arteries were studied using DUS in an accredited ICAVL vascular laboratory. Threshold velocity criteria for determining the degree of carotid stenosis was defined according to seven categories: <50%, 50-59%, 60-69%, 70-79%, 80-89%, 90-99%, and occlusion. Treatment decisions were based on the angiographic findings. In cases where the degree of stenosis as defined by duplex velocity criteria did not correlate with angiographically defined stenosis, each record was reviewed to determine whether the angiographic findings altered the surgeon's treatment decision. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for DUS-defined degree of stenosis as compared to angiographically defined stenosis were determined. There was a high correlation (R = 0.96) between duplex scan and angiography in 93% (302/326) of the cases. Clinical management was altered in only 3% (10/326) of the cases because of the results of angiography. The DUS velocity criteria to grade the severity of carotid disease in 10% intervals is reliable and accurate. Clinical management of patients with carotid stenosis can be based solely on carotid DUS in 97% of patients considered for treatment of carotid artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12118345     DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0175-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  12 in total

1.  Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; James R Fink; Suzie M El-Saden; Edward G Grant
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  T Forjoe; M Asad Rahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 5.  Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Combined use of color duplex ultrasonography and B-flow imaging for evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Muharrem Tola; Mehmet Yurdakul; Turhan Cumhur
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 8.  Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Yong Jae Kim; Charles H Tegeler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Poor agreement in carotid artery stenosis detection by ultrasound between external offices and a vascular center.

Authors:  Georgiana-Aura Giurgea; Ilda Lilaj; Michael E Gschwandtner; Christian Margeta; Sonja Zehetmayer; Christoph Domenig; Oliver Schlager; Michael Schwameis; Renate Koppensteiner; Andrea Willfort-Ehringer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Multimodality imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Going beyond stenosis.

Authors:  Divyata Hingwala; Chandrasekharan Kesavadas; Padmavathy N Sylaja; Bejoy Thomas; Tirur Raman Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.