Literature DB >> 12116391

Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations.

Daniel J Price1, Charles L Brooks.   

Abstract

Several molecular dynamics simulations were performed on three proteins--bovine apo-calbindin D9K, human interleukin-4 R88Q mutant, and domain IIA of bacillus subtilis glucose permease--with each of the AMBER94, CHARMM22, and OPLS-AA force fields as implemented in CHARMM. Structural and dynamic properties such as solvent-accessible surface area, radius of gyration, deviation from their respective experimental structures, secondary structure, and backbone order parameters are obtained from each of the 2-ns simulations for the purpose of comparing the protein portions of these force fields. For one of the proteins, the interleukin-4 mutant, two independent simulations were performed using the CHARMM22 force field to gauge the sensitivity of some of these properties to the specific trajectory. In general, the force fields tested performed remarkably similarly with differences on the order of those found for the two independent trajectories of interleukin-4 with CHARMM22. When all three proteins are considered together, no force field showed any consistent trend in variations for most of the properties monitored in the study. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1045-1057, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12116391     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  21 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics and protein function.

Authors:  M Karplus; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the characterization of protein native state ensembles.

Authors:  Amarda Shehu; Lydia E Kavraki; Cecilia Clementi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 4.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Biomolecularmodeling and simulation: a field coming of age.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Leif Arthur Halvorsen; Segun Jung; Xia Xiao
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Effect of monovalent ion binding on molecular dynamics of the S100-family calcium-binding protein calbindin D9k.

Authors:  Mahendra Thapa; Eric Johnson; Mark Rance
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  On the ability of molecular dynamics force fields to recapitulate NMR derived protein side chain order parameters.

Authors:  Evan S O'Brien; A Joshua Wand; Kim A Sharp
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Accurate PDZ/Peptide Binding Specificity with Additive and Polarizable Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Nicolas Panel; Francesco Villa; Ernesto J Fuentes; Thomas Simonson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Recent Developments and Applications of the CHARMM force fields.

Authors:  Xiao Zhu; Pedro E M Lopes; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2011-06-28

10.  Sensitivity of 2D IR spectra to peptide helicity: a concerted experimental and simulation study of an octapeptide.

Authors:  Neelanjana Sengupta; Hiroaki Maekawa; Wei Zhuang; Claudio Toniolo; Shaul Mukamel; Douglas J Tobias; Nien-Hui Ge
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.