Literature DB >> 12116107

Duplex sonographic criteria for measuring carotid stenoses.

Ivan N Staikov1, Krassen Nedeltchev, Marcel Arnold, Luca Remonda, Gerhard Schroth, Matthias Sturzenegger, Cornelia Herrmann, Anita Rivoir, Heinrich P Mattle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine optimal duplex sonographic criteria for use in our institution for diagnosing severe carotid stenoses and to correlate those findings with angiographic measurements obtained by the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), and Common Carotid (CC) methods of grading carotid stenoses.
METHODS: We analyzed the angiographic data using the ECST, NASCET, and CC methods and compared the results with the duplex sonographic findings. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the duplex sonographic method. Taking these parameters into account, the optimal intrastenotic peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) were derived for diagnosing severe stenoses according to the 3 angiographic methods.
RESULTS: Optimal PSV and EDV values for diagnosing a 70% or greater stenosis in our laboratory were as follows: with the NASCET method of angiographic grading of stenoses, PSV 220 cm/second or greater and EDV 80 cm/second or greater, and with the ECST and CC methods, PSV 190 cm/second or greater, and EDV 65 cm/second or greater. The optimal PSV and EDV for diagnosing a stenosis of 80% or greater with the ECST grading method were 215 cm/second or greater and 90 cm/second or greater, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Duplex sonography is a sensitive and accurate tool for evaluating severe carotid stenoses. Optimal PSVs and EDVs vary according to the angiographic method used to grade the stenosis. They are similar for stenoses 70% or greater with the NASCET method and for stenoses 80% or greater with the ECST method. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12116107     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.10078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  14 in total

1.  [CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types].

Authors:  M Lell; K Anders; C Leidecker; W Lang; W Bautz; M Uder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Sonographic NASCET index: a new doppler parameter for assessment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Gasser M Hathout; James R Fink; Suzie M El-Saden; Edward G Grant
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.

Authors:  Hasan K Kabul; Klaus D Hagspiel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  T Forjoe; M Asad Rahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Toward hemodynamic diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis based on ultrasound image data and computational modeling.

Authors:  Luísa C Sousa; Catarina F Castro; Carlos C António; André Miguel F Santos; Rosa Maria Dos Santos; Pedro Miguel A C Castro; Elsa Azevedo; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Wael E Shaalan; Carl M Wahlgren; Tina Desai; Giancarlo Piano; Christopher Skelly; Hisham S Bassiouny
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.

Authors:  Zishu Zhang; Marja H Berg; Aki E J Ikonen; Ritva L Vanninen; Hannu I Manninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Restenosis after microsurgical non-patch carotid endarterectomy in 586 patients.

Authors:  Michael Reinert; Marie-Louise Mono; Dominique Kuhlen; Luigi Mariani; Alain Barth; Jürgen Beck; Robert H Andres; Jan Gralla; Rolf Wymann; Jürgen Schmidt; Christin Kauert; Gerhard Schroth; Marcel Arnold; Heinrich P Mattle; Andreas Raabe; Urs Fischer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.