BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due mostly to a defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR). Inactivation of the two principal MMR genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, and the PTEN tumor suppressor gene seems to be involved in endometrial tumorigenesis. In this study, Sardinian patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) were analyzed to assess the prevalence of both the mutator phenotype (as defined by the presence of MSI and abnormal MMR gene expression at the somatic level) and the hMLH1, hMSH2, and PTEN germline mutations among patients with MSI positive EC. METHODS: Paraffin embedded tissue samples from 116 consecutive patients with EC were screened for MSI by polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite analysis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti-hMLH1 and anti-hMSH2 antibodies was performed on MSI positive tumor tissue sections. Germline DNA was used for mutational screening by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis and automated sequencing. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with EC (34%) exhibited MSI; among them, 25 tumor samples (64%) showed negative immunostaining for hMLH1/hMSH2 proteins (referred to as IHC negative). No disease-causing mutation within the coding sequences of the hMLH1/hMSH2 and PTEN genes was found in patients with EC who had the mutator phenotype (MSI positive and IHC negative), except for a newly described hMLH1 missense mutation, Ile655Val, that was observed in 1 of 27 patients (4%). Although MSI was more common among patients with advanced-stage EC and increased as the tumor grade increased, no significant correlation with disease free survival or overall survival was observed among the two groups (MSI positive or MSI negative) of patients with EC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MSI positive EC, epigenetic inactivations rather than genetic mutations of the MMR genes seem to be involved in endometrial tumorigenesis. No prognostic value was demonstrated for MSI in patients with EC. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due mostly to a defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR). Inactivation of the two principal MMR genes, hMLH1 and hMSH2, and the PTENtumor suppressor gene seems to be involved in endometrial tumorigenesis. In this study, Sardinian patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) were analyzed to assess the prevalence of both the mutator phenotype (as defined by the presence of MSI and abnormal MMR gene expression at the somatic level) and the hMLH1, hMSH2, and PTEN germline mutations among patients with MSI positive EC. METHODS:Paraffin embedded tissue samples from 116 consecutive patients with EC were screened for MSI by polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite analysis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti-hMLH1 and anti-hMSH2 antibodies was performed on MSI positive tumor tissue sections. Germline DNA was used for mutational screening by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis and automated sequencing. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with EC (34%) exhibited MSI; among them, 25 tumor samples (64%) showed negative immunostaining for hMLH1/hMSH2 proteins (referred to as IHC negative). No disease-causing mutation within the coding sequences of the hMLH1/hMSH2 and PTEN genes was found in patients with EC who had the mutator phenotype (MSI positive and IHC negative), except for a newly described hMLH1 missense mutation, Ile655Val, that was observed in 1 of 27 patients (4%). Although MSI was more common among patients with advanced-stage EC and increased as the tumor grade increased, no significant correlation with disease free survival or overall survival was observed among the two groups (MSI positive or MSI negative) of patients with EC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MSI positive EC, epigenetic inactivations rather than genetic mutations of the MMR genes seem to be involved in endometrial tumorigenesis. No prognostic value was demonstrated for MSI in patients with EC. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
Authors: D Scott McMeekin; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Heather A Lankes; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Richard Zaino; Russell D Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Feng Gao; Shamshad Ali; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anita Steinbakk; Anais Malpica; Aida Slewa; Einar Gudlaugsson; Emiel A M Janssen; Mark Arends; Arnold Jan Kruse; Yu Yinhua; Weiwei Feng; Jan P Baak Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Daiva Kanopiene; Jolanta Vidugiriene; Konstantinas Povilas Valuckas; Giedre Smailyte; Saule Uleckiene; Jeff Bacher Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2014-11-11
Authors: Giuseppe Palmieri; Maria Colombino; Antonio Cossu; Antonio Marchetti; Gerardo Botti; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Chris Stinton; Mary Jordan; Hannah Fraser; Peter Auguste; Rachel Court; Lena Al-Khudairy; Jason Madan; Dimitris Grammatopoulos; Sian Taylor-Phillips Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 4.014