Literature DB >> 12114721

Proliferative Activity in Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors: Association with Function, Metastases, and Survival.

Martha R. Clarke1, Evan E. Baker, Robert J. Weyant, Lisa Hill, Sally E. Carty.   

Abstract

Endocrine tumors of the pancreas are slow-growing lesions, yet one-third to one-half will metastasize. It is generally accepted that histopathologic features do not reliably predict metastatic potential or outcome. We investigated whether proliferative activity, as determined by MIB-l labeling, correlated with tumor type, metastasis, or patient survival. Formalin-fixed sections of pancreatic endocrine tumors were immunohistochemically stained for the MIB-l antibody against Ki-67 using the avidin-biotin complex technique. Labeling index (LI) was determined by counting 1000 consecutive tumor cells in an area of greatest staining intensity at x400 and expressed as a percentage. The study group included 37 patients, including 10 gastrinomas, 9 insulinomas, 4 glucagonomas, 2 VlPomas, and 12 nonfunctioning tumors. Twenty-one patients had metastases, primarily to regional lymph nodes and the liver. Five patients had MEN I. MIB-1 LI was significantly greater in the nonfunctioning tumors (mean 20S%) than in the functioning tumors (mean 51%) (p = 0.01). LI for functional tumors (insulinomas 64%, glucagonoma 44%, gastrinomas 32%, VlPomas 32%) were similar to each other, MIB-1 was significantly higher in those tumors that metastasized (mean 15.6%) compared to those that did not (mean 31%), (p = 0.04). All tumors with MIB-1 LI >10% developed metastases. Logistic regression showed that MIB-1 was a significant predictor of metastases (p = 0.003) after adjusting for functional status. MIB-1 LI also correlated with outcome in that those patients with MIB-1 LI >/=10% had a mean survival of 19 mo compared to 72 mo for those with levels <10% (p = 0.0001). Results of the proportional hazards model showed that MIR-1 remained a significant (p = 0.03) and independent predictor of survival times after adjustment for tumor size and functional status. Higher MIB-1 LI values were significantly associated with shorter survival times. In conclusion, MIB-1 LI appears to be a useful indicator of metastatic potential and is predictive of outcome in PET.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 12114721     DOI: 10.1007/bf02738784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pathol        ISSN: 1046-3976            Impact factor:   3.943


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of morphologic and immunocytochemical assessments of cell proliferation.

Authors:  M D Linden; F X Torres; J Kubus; R J Zarbo
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Which proliferation markers for routine immunohistology? A comparison of five antibodies.

Authors:  D S Rose; P H Maddox; D C Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  The gastroenteropancreatic endocrine system and related tumors.

Authors:  E Solcia; C Capella; R Fiocca; M Cornaggia; F Bosi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  [Endocrine tumors of the pancreas and duodenum].

Authors:  P U Heitz; G Klöppel
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol       Date:  1987

5.  Detection of the Ki-67 antigen in fixed and wax-embedded sections with the monoclonal antibody MIB1.

Authors:  D McCormick; H Chong; C Hobbs; C Datta; P A Hall
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Nonfunctioning malignant neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  F E Eckhauser; P S Cheung; A I Vinik; W E Strodel; R V Lloyd; N W Thompson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Immunodetection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen assesses the growth fraction and predicts malignancy in endocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  G Pelosi; G Zamboni; C Doglioni; S Rodella; E Bresaola; C Iacono; G Serio; A Iannucci; A Scarpa
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Immunohistochemical assessment of proliferative activity in adrenocortical neoplasms.

Authors:  J R Goldblum; R Shannon; E P Kaldjian; M Thiny; R Davenport; N Thompson; R V Lloyd
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Proliferation markers in breast carcinoma. Mitotic figure count, S-phase fraction, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67 and MIB-1.

Authors:  A A Keshgegian; A Cnaan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Assessment of the new proliferation marker MIB1 in breast carcinoma using image analysis: associations with other prognostic factors and survival.

Authors:  S E Pinder; P Wencyk; D M Sibbering; J A Bell; C W Elston; R Nicholson; J F Robertson; R W Blamey; I O Ellis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Pathological assessment of pancreatic endocrine tumors for metastatic potential and clinical prognosis.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Ohike; Toshio Morohoshi
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Interlaboratory variability of MIB1 staining in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Annika Blank; Laura Wehweck; Ilaria Marinoni; Laura Amanda Boos; Frank Bergmann; Anja Maria Schmitt; Aurel Perren
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Endocrine pancreatic tumors with glucagon hypersecretion: a retrospective study of 23 cases during 20 years.

Authors:  Henrik Kindmark; Anders Sundin; Dan Granberg; Kristina Dunder; Britt Skogseid; Eva Tiensuu Janson; Staffan Welin; Kjell Oberg; Barbro Eriksson
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: epidemiology and prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Joseph Rubin; Michael B Farnell; Clive S Grant; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  Prognostic Significance of p27, Ki-67, and Topoisomerase lla Expression in Clinically Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hee Jin Chang; Kenneth P. Batts; Ricardo V. Lloyd; Thomas J. Sebo; Geoffrey B. Thompson; Christine M. Lohse; Shane V. Pankratz
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.943

8.  Management of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast: A rare entity.

Authors:  Yesim Yildirim; Sahende Elagoz; Ayhan Koyuncu; Cengiz Aydin; Kursat Karadayi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Molecular challenges of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Parthik Patel; Karina Galoian
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  The ENETS/WHO grading system for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a review of the current state, limitations and proposals for modifications.

Authors:  Marcela S Cavalcanti; Mithat Gönen; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Int J Endocr Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.