Literature DB >> 12113204

Painful procedures in pediatric cancer. A comparison of interventions.

Wendy G Kuppenheimer1, Ronald T Brown.   

Abstract

Different interventions (i.e., cognitive-behavioral, pharmacological) and their combination were examined and compared to assist pediatric patients with cancer to manage distress during painful procedures. Findings revealed that cognitive protocols are effective in relieving procedural distress for a significant number of children. Pharmacological therapies were found to be relatively safe and effective when carefully administered and monitored by medical personnel. Data from combined cognitive therapies and pharmacological interventions, particularly those more recent pharmacological interventions, reveal generally mixed results, with both types of interventions yielding distinct benefits and disadvantages. Recommendations are made for future studies that match interventions to specific characteristics of the children for whom they are intended, as well as additional studies that combine pharmacological approaches together with cognitive techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12113204     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  12 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating psychological approaches into routine paediatric venepuncture.

Authors:  A J A Duff
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Use of complementary and alternative medical interventions for the management of procedure-related pain, anxiety, and distress in pediatric oncology: an integrative review.

Authors:  Wendy Landier; Alice M Tse
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.145

3.  Utilization of integrative medicine differs by age among pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Hyeongjun Yun; Sally A D Romero; Benjamin Record; Julia Kearney; Nirupa Jaya Raghunathan; Stephen Sands; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  A mixed methods assessment of coping with pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Aimee K Hildenbrand; Melissa A Alderfer; Janet A Deatrick; Meghan L Marsac
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2014

5.  Acceptability and feasibility of family use of The Cellie Cancer Coping Kit.

Authors:  Meghan L Marsac; Aimee K Hildenbrand; Kathleen Clawson; Leela Jackson; Kristen Kohser; Lamia Barakat; Nancy Kassam-Adams; Richard Aplenc; Anne Vinsel; Melissa A Alderfer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Sensitivity to Pain in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).

Authors:  Manijeh Firoozi; Reza Rostami
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

7.  Determining, ranking and comparing treatment stressors in children and adolescents with cancer in tehran.

Authors:  Narges Azizi; Ladan Mansour; Karineh Tahmassian; Farideh Mosavi
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

8.  Safety and Efficacy of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Pediatric Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Saba Laila Aslam; Anwar Haque; Muhammad Tariq Jamil; Madiha Ariff; Saad Nasir
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-28

9.  Mindfulness-based intervention for teenagers with cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine Malboeuf-Hurtubise; Marie Achille; Serge Sultan; Majorie Vadnais
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  How effective are spiritual care and body manipulation therapies in pediatric oncology? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Renald Lemieux
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2013-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.