Literature DB >> 12112888

Results of the Jostent coronary stent graft implantation in various clinical settings: procedural and follow-up results.

Ulrich Gercken1, Alexandra J Lansky, Lutz Buellesfeld, Kartik Desai, Magdy Badereldin, Ralf Mueller, Guido Selbach, Martin B Leon, Eberhard Grube.   

Abstract

The Jostent coronary stent graft (CSG) is composed of a PTFE layer sandwiched between two stainless steel stents, initially introduced for the treatment of coronary perforations and aneurysms with excellent results. By providing a mechanical barrier, this stent design also may be beneficial in the treatment of complex ulcerated lesions and in-stent restenosis by preventing debris protrusion and neointimal proliferation through the stent struts. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this stent graft, we implanted 78 CSGs in 70 patients for a broad range of indications, including coronary perforations, aneurysms, degenerated saphenous vein grafts, complex lesions, and in-stent restenosis. The primary angiographic success rate (95.9%) was high, and using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance during stent implantation and high inflation pressures (19.3 +/- 3.2 atm), stent expansion with optimal symmetry was achieved in 94.7%. One limitation of the Jostent CSG was the side-branch occlusion rate (18.6%) and the resulting non-Q-wave infarction rate in seven cases (mean CK elevation, 238 U/l), acute Q-wave MI in two cases, and transient ventricular fibrillation in one patient after occlusion of the proximal RCA side branch without further complications. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in four cases (5.7%) 7 to 70 days after stent implantation, despite using combined antiplatelet therapy with aspirin (ASA), ticlopidine, and/or clopidogrel for 30 days. Angiographic follow-up was available in 56 patients (80.0%) after a mean of 159 +/- 49 days, and follow-up IVUS was available in 38 cases. The overall restenosis rate (> 50% diameter stenosis) was 31.6% manifest primarily as edge restenosis (29.8% stent edge vs. 8.8% stent center; P < 0.001). IVUS examinations showed a minimal late lumen loss of 0.4 +/- 2.2 mm(2) within the center of the stent graft vs. 3.2 +/- 2.3 mm(2) at the stent edges (P < 0.001). The restenosis rate in the prespecified subgroups was 33.3% for saphenous vein grafts (2/6 lesions), 30.0% in complex lesions (6/20 lesions), and 38.5% (10/26 lesions) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Implantation of the Jostent CSG is feasible and safe, even in complex lesion subsets, and is associated with high primary success rates provided major side branches are avoided. The use of this stent may require an extended time course of antiplatelet therapy. Frequent focal stent edge renarrowing influences the overall restenosis rate. However, in treatment of complex in-stent restenosis and vein graft lesions, stent grafts may offer benefit over conventional therapies. Covered stents such as the JoMed coronary stent graft may become essential for bailout treatment of coronary perforations. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12112888     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  31 in total

1.  Stent graft placement for the treatment of giant aneurysm at the proximal cavernous internal carotid artery. A case report.

Authors:  S Katayama; K Fujita; N Takeda; Y Okamura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Follow-up for covered stent treatment of carotid blow-out syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Chia-Jen Wu; Wei-Chen Lin; Jui-Sheng Hsu; I-Ting Han; Tsyh-Jyi Hsieh; Gin-Chung Liu; I-Chan Chiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Results of transvenous embolization of cavernous dural arteriovenous fistula: a single-center experience with emphasis on complications and management.

Authors:  D J Kim; D I Kim; S H Suh; J Kim; S K Lee; E Y Kim; T S Chung
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Coronary artery stents: identification and evaluation.

Authors:  J Butany; K Carmichael; S W Leong; M J Collins
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Coronary fistulae: which ones deserve treatment, and what kind of treatment do they need?

Authors:  Paolo Angelini
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007

6.  Successful treatment of in-stent restenosis of a covered stent graft with a paclitaxel-eluting stent.

Authors:  Khalid Bin Thani; William E Bennett; Amir Ravandi; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-05-04

7.  Restenosis of a Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered Stent Visualized by Coronary Angioscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography: A Case Report.

Authors:  Makoto Araki; Hiroyuki Hikita; Yuta Sudo; Keiichi Hishikari; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-04-16

8.  Carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head-and-neck cancers: reconstructive management by self-expandable stent-grafts.

Authors:  F-C Chang; J-F Lirng; C-B Luo; W-Y Guo; M M H Teng; S-K Tai; C-Y Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Successful treatment of a common hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm using a coronary covered stent following pancreatoduodenectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Koji Asai; Manabu Watanabe; Shinya Kusachi; Hiroshi Matsukiyo; Tomoaki Saito; Hajime Kodama; Toshiyuki Enomoto; Yoichi Nakamura; Yasushi Okamoto; Yoshihisa Saida; Raisuke Iijima; Jiro Nagao
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Treatment of carotid cavernous fistulas using covered stents: midterm results in seven patients.

Authors:  F Gomez; W Escobar; A M Gomez; J F Gomez; C A Anaya
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.