OBJECTIVES: The association between the risk of breast cancer and the physical load of work was studied because physical activity may reduce breast cancer risk via hormonal mechanisms. METHODS: Occupational physical activity was estimated from a self-determined rating [scale 1 (low)-5 (high)] of occupational physical load for 1800 randomly selected women born in 1930-1969. The medians of the ratings were used as occupation-specific indices of occupational physical activity. All 65 occupations with at least 5 ratings, covering 75% of the economically active female population in Finland, were included in further analyses. The occupation-specific numbers of observed and expected cases of breast cancer during 1971-1995 among women born in 1906-1945 (17,986 cases) were grouped according to the index for occupational physical activity. Expected rates were calculated with the social-class-specific population and the entire Finnish female population as reference populations. The relative risks (RR) of breast cancer for categories 3-5, in comparison with categories 1-2 were calculated using Poisson regression models. The occupation-specific mean number of children and mean age at first childbirth were adjusted for. RESULTS: The RR was lower for occupations in category 5 than for those in categories 1-4, especially in the youngest (25-39 years) age group (RR 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.58). Adjustment for social class and reproductive factors raised the RR (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.74) for category 5 in different age strata, all the RR values still being statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that occupational physical activity, if high enough, markedly reduces breast cancer risk.
OBJECTIVES: The association between the risk of breast cancer and the physical load of work was studied because physical activity may reduce breast cancer risk via hormonal mechanisms. METHODS: Occupational physical activity was estimated from a self-determined rating [scale 1 (low)-5 (high)] of occupational physical load for 1800 randomly selected women born in 1930-1969. The medians of the ratings were used as occupation-specific indices of occupational physical activity. All 65 occupations with at least 5 ratings, covering 75% of the economically active female population in Finland, were included in further analyses. The occupation-specific numbers of observed and expected cases of breast cancer during 1971-1995 among women born in 1906-1945 (17,986 cases) were grouped according to the index for occupational physical activity. Expected rates were calculated with the social-class-specific population and the entire Finnish female population as reference populations. The relative risks (RR) of breast cancer for categories 3-5, in comparison with categories 1-2 were calculated using Poisson regression models. The occupation-specific mean number of children and mean age at first childbirth were adjusted for. RESULTS: The RR was lower for occupations in category 5 than for those in categories 1-4, especially in the youngest (25-39 years) age group (RR 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.58). Adjustment for social class and reproductive factors raised the RR (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.74) for category 5 in different age strata, all the RR values still being statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that occupational physical activity, if high enough, markedly reduces breast cancer risk.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Stephanie M George; Melinda L Irwin; Charles E Matthews; Susan T Mayne; Mitchell H Gail; Steven C Moore; Demetrius Albanes; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sonia S Maruti; Walter C Willett; Diane Feskanich; Bernard Rosner; Graham A Colditz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-05-13 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: A Pronk; B-T Ji; X-O Shu; W-H Chow; S Xue; G Yang; H-L Li; N Rothman; Y-T Gao; W Zheng; C E Matthews Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Pablo Méndez-Hernández; Yvonne Flores; Carole Siani; Michel Lamure; L Darina Dosamantes-Carrasco; Elizabeth Halley-Castillo; Gerardo Huitrón; Juan O Talavera; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Jorge Salmerón Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-07-31 Impact factor: 3.295