Ulrich H M Spandau1, Klaus Rohrschneider. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of Usher syndrome in Heidelberg and Mannheim and to map its geographical distribution in Germany. METHODS: Usher syndrome patients were ascertained through the databases of the Low Vision Department at the University of Heidelberg, and of the patient support group Pro Retina. Ophthalmic and audiologic examinations and medical records were used to classify patients into one of the subtypes. RESULTS: The database of the University of Heidelberg contains 247 Usher syndrome patients, 63 with Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1) and 184 with Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2). The USH1:USH2 ratio in the Heidelberg database was 1:3. The Pro Retina database includes 248 Usher syndrome patients, 21 with USH1 and 227 with USH2. The total number of Usher syndrome patients was 424, with 75 USH1 and 349 USH2 patients; 71 patients were in both databases. The prevalence of Usher syndrome in Heidelberg and suburbs was calculated to be 6.2 per 100,000 inhabitants. There seems to be a homogeneous distribution in Germany for both subtypes. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the high prevalence of Usher syndrome, with up to 5,000 patients in Germany, should lead to increased awareness and timely diagnosis by ophthalmologists and otologists. It should also ensure that these patients receive good support through hearing and vision aids.
PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of Usher syndrome in Heidelberg and Mannheim and to map its geographical distribution in Germany. METHODS:Usher syndromepatients were ascertained through the databases of the Low Vision Department at the University of Heidelberg, and of the patient support group Pro Retina. Ophthalmic and audiologic examinations and medical records were used to classify patients into one of the subtypes. RESULTS: The database of the University of Heidelberg contains 247 Usher syndromepatients, 63 with Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1) and 184 with Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2). The USH1:USH2 ratio in the Heidelberg database was 1:3. The Pro Retina database includes 248 Usher syndromepatients, 21 with USH1 and 227 with USH2. The total number of Usher syndromepatients was 424, with 75 USH1 and 349 USH2patients; 71 patients were in both databases. The prevalence of Usher syndrome in Heidelberg and suburbs was calculated to be 6.2 per 100,000 inhabitants. There seems to be a homogeneous distribution in Germany for both subtypes. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the high prevalence of Usher syndrome, with up to 5,000 patients in Germany, should lead to increased awareness and timely diagnosis by ophthalmologists and otologists. It should also ensure that these patients receive good support through hearing and vision aids.
Authors: Terri L McGee; Babak Jian Seyedahmadi; Meredith O Sweeney; Thaddeus P Dryja; Eliot L Berson Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2010-05-27 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Gema Garcia-Garcia; Maria J Aparisi; Teresa Jaijo; Regina Rodrigo; Ana M Leon; Almudena Avila-Fernandez; Fiona Blanco-Kelly; Sara Bernal; Rafael Navarro; Manuel Diaz-Llopis; Montserrat Baiget; Carmen Ayuso; Jose M Millan; Elena Aller Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Inga Ebermann; Hendrik P N Scholl; Peter Charbel Issa; Elvir Becirovic; Jürgen Lamprecht; Bernhard Jurklies; José M Millán; Elena Aller; Diana Mitter; Hanno Bolz Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Erwin van Wijk; Ferry F J Kersten; Aileen Kartono; Dorus A Mans; Kim Brandwijk; Stef J F Letteboer; Theo A Peters; Tina Märker; Xiumin Yan; Cor W R J Cremers; Frans P M Cremers; Uwe Wolfrum; Ronald Roepman; Hannie Kremer Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Erwin van Wijk; Ronald J E Pennings; Heleen te Brinke; Annemarie Claassen; Helger G Yntema; Lies H Hoefsloot; Frans P M Cremers; Cor W R J Cremers; Hannie Kremer Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2004-03-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Juha Isosomppi; Hanna Västinsalo; Scott F Geller; Elise Heon; John G Flannery; Eeva-Marja Sankila Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 2.367