Literature DB >> 12102502

Reactive oxygen species in cell responses to toxic agents.

L E Feinendegen1.   

Abstract

This review first summarizes experimental data on biological effects of different concentrations of ROS in mammalian cells and on their potential role in modifying cell responses to toxic agents. It then attempts to link the role of steadily produced metabolic ROS at various concentrations in mammalian cells to that of environmentally derived ROS bursts from exposure to ionizing radiation. The ROS from both sources are known to both cause biological damage and change cellular signaling, depending on their concentration at a given time. At low concentrations signaling effects of ROS appear to protect cellular survival and dominate over damage, and the reverse occurs at high ROS concentrations. Background radiation generates suprabasal ROS bursts along charged particle tracks several times a year in each nanogram of tissue, i.e., average mass of a mammalian cell. For instance, a burst of about 200 ROS occurs within less than a microsecond from low-LET irradiation such as X-rays along the track of a Compton electron (about 6 keV, ranging about 1 microm). One such track per nanogram tissue gives about 1 mGy to this mass. The number of instantaneous ROS per burst along the track of a 4-meV alpha-particle in 1 ng tissue reaches some 70000. The sizes, types and sites of these bursts, and the time intervals between them directly in and around cells appear essential for understanding low-dose and low dose-rate effects on top of effects from endogenous ROS. At background and low-dose radiation exposure, a major role of ROS bursts along particle tracks focuses on ROS-induced apoptosis of damage-carrying cells, and also on prevention and removal of DNA damage from endogenous sources by way of temporarily protective, i.e., adaptive, cellular responses. A conclusion is to consider low-dose radiation exposure as a provider of physiological mechanisms for tissue homoeostasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12102502     DOI: 10.1191/0960327102ht216oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  36 in total

1.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Authors:  Ludwig E Feinendegen; Myron Pollycove; Charles A Sondhaus
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

3.  Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Reconvene and reconnect the antioxidant hypothesis in human health and disease.

Authors:  P P Singh; Anu Chandra; Farzana Mahdi; Ajanta Roy; Praveen Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-09-03

5.  Antitumor activity of a novel STAT3 inhibitor and redox modulator in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Xiaoying Liu; Wei Guo; Shuhong Wu; Li Wang; Ji Wang; Bingbing Dai; Edward S Kim; John V Heymach; Michael Wang; Luc Girard; John Minna; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher; Bingliang Fang
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  The effect of L-carnitine in the prevention of ionizing radiation-induced cataracts: a rat model.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kocer; Seyithan Taysi; Mustafa Vecdi Ertekin; Ihsan Karslioglu; Akcahan Gepdiremen; Orhan Sezen; Korkmaz Serifoglu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury.

Authors:  Edouard I Azzam; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin; Debkumar Pain
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 8.  Mitochondrial abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease: possible targets for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Diana F Silva; J Eva Selfridge; Jianghua Lu; Lezi E; Sandra M Cardoso; Russell H Swerdlow
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2012

9.  ErbB2, FoxM1 and 14-3-3ζ prime breast cancer cells for invasion in response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  D M Kambach; V L Sodi; P I Lelkes; J Azizkhan-Clifford; M J Reginato
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 10.  ATM-NF-kappaB connection as a target for tumor radiosensitization.

Authors:  Kazi Mokim Ahmed; Jian Jian Li
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.