Literature DB >> 12101193

Analysis of the sensitivity of death certificates in 440 hospital deaths: a comparison with necropsy findings.

J D Sington1, B J Cottrell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is current heightened public interest in issues surrounding death certification and necropsy. The present study was initiated to determine the accuracy of death certification in providing a correct diagnosis in a series of adult deaths occurring in hospital, all of which were followed by a necropsy.
METHOD: We examined a series of 440 consecutive adult hospital necropsies performed at Addenbrooke's Hospital, without prior knowledge of the cause of death on the death certificate. The major causes of death at necropsy were subdivided on the basis of organ systems and subsequently compared with the cause of death stated on the death certificate.
RESULTS: There were 448 stated causes of death on the death certificates, compared with 508 causes recorded at necropsy. The overall sensitivity of the death certificate in predicting an individual cause of death was 0.47, with sensitivities ranging from 0.90 in the neurological system to 0.28 in the cardiovascular system, and the sensitivity for all malignant causes of death was 0.65. No significant overall differences were noted in respiratory, gastrointestinal, malignant, and "other" systems when comparing causes of death on the death certificate with those at necropsy.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial discrepancy between the diagnosis given on death certificates compared with that at hospital necropsy. This paper discusses the importance of clinicopathological concordance and emphasises the importance of the necropsy in death certification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12101193      PMCID: PMC1769693          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.55.7.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  18 in total

1.  Ill-defined and multiple causes on death certificates--a study of misclassification in mortality statistics.

Authors:  M D'Amico; E Agozzino; A Biagino; A Simonetti; P Marinelli
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Inadequacy of death certification: proposal for change.

Authors:  T G Ashworth
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Is necropsy a valid monitor of clinical diagnosis performance?

Authors:  R Saracci
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-12

4.  Improving accuracy of death certificates.

Authors:  J B Barber
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Improving the accuracy of death certification.

Authors:  K A Myers; D R Farquhar
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-05-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [Significance of autopsy. Continuous evaluation of autopsy findings by internists].

Authors:  J A Laissue; H J Altermatt; B Zürcher; B Truniger; J O Gebbers
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1986-02-01

7.  The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate.

Authors:  T Kircher; J Nelson; H Burdo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Reliability of death certifications for different types of cancer. An autopsy survey.

Authors:  F Mollo; E Bertoldo; G Grandi; F Cavallo
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Age and the declining rate of autopsy.

Authors:  E W Campion; V A Reder; A G Mulley; G E Thibault
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Can histopathologists diagnose bronchopneumonia?

Authors:  C R Hunt; E W Benbow; W F Knox; R F McMahon; L J McWilliam
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  33 in total

1.  Medical error reporting must take necropsy data into account.

Authors:  J Sington; B Cottrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  The impact of the organ retention controversy on the practice of hospital necropsy: a four year audit.

Authors:  D McGuone; E W Kay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Trends of accuracy of clinical diagnoses of the basic cause of death in a university hospital.

Authors:  M H C Grade; S Zucoloto; J K Kajiwara; M T P Fernandes; L G F Couto; S B Garcia
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The medical autopsy: past, present, and dubious future.

Authors:  Louis P Dehner
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr

5.  Improving Validity of Cause of Death on Death Certificates.

Authors:  Ryan A Hoffman; Janani Venugopalan; Li Qu; Hang Wu; May D Wang
Journal:  ACM BCB       Date:  2018-08

Review 6.  A literature review: the cardiovascular effects of exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  David Andrew McNamee; Alexandre G Legros; Daniel R Krewski; Gerald Wisenberg; Frank S Prato; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Impact of misclassification on measures of cardiovascular disease mortality in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ardeshir Khosravi; Chalapati Rao; Mohsen Naghavi; Richard Taylor; Nahid Jafari; Alan D Lopez
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Clinical or postmortem? The importance of the autopsy; a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mariana Costache; Anca Mihaela Lazaroiu; Andreea Contolenco; Diana Costache; Simion George; Maria Sajin; Oana Maria Patrascu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-09

9.  Overreporting of deaths from coronary heart disease in New York City hospitals, 2003.

Authors:  Reena Agarwal; Jennifer M Norton; Kevin Konty; Regina Zimmerman; Maleeka Glover; Akaki Lekiachvili; Henraya McGruder; Ann Malarcher; Michele Casper; George A Mensah; Lorna Thorpe
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Gene promoter methylation is associated with increased mortality among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinran Xu; Marilie D Gammon; Yujing Zhang; Yoon Hee Cho; James G Wetmur; Patrick T Bradshaw; Gail Garbowski; Hanina Hibshoosh; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Jia Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.