Literature DB >> 12099795

A phylogeny of the megapodes (Aves: Megapodiidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Sharon M Birks1, Scott V Edwards.   

Abstract

DNA sequences from the first intron of the nuclear gene rhodopsin (RDP1) and from the mitochondrial gene ND2 were used to construct a phylogeny of the avian family Megapodiidae. RDP1 sequences evolved about six times more slowly than ND2 and showed less homoplasy, substitution bias, and rate heterogeneity across sites. Analysis of RDP1 produced a phylogeny that was well resolved at the genus level, but RDP1 did not evolve rapidly enough for intrageneric comparisons. The ND2 phylogeny resolved intrageneric relationships and was congruent with the RDP1 phylogeny except for a single node: this node was the only aspect of tree topology sensitive to weighting in parsimony analyses. Despite differences in sequence evolution, RDP1 and ND2 contained congruent phylogenetic signal and were combined to produce a phylogeny that reflects the resolving power of both genes. This phylogeny shows an early split within the megapodes, leading to two major clades: (1) Macrocephalon and the mound-building genera Talegalla, Leipoa, Aepypodius, and Alectura, and (2) Eulipoa and Megapodius. It differs significantly from previous hypotheses based on morphology but is consistent with affiliations suggested by a recent study of parasitic chewing lice. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12099795     DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00002-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  12 in total

1.  Partial island submergence and speciation in an adaptive radiation: a multilocus analysis of the Cuban green anoles.

Authors:  Richard E Glor; Matthew E Gifford; Allan Larson; Jonathan B Losos; Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino; Ada R Chamizo Lara; Todd R Jackman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; W Bryan Jennings; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Taxonomic review of the late Cenozoic megapodes (Galliformes: Megapodiidae) of Australia.

Authors:  Elen Shute; Gavin J Prideaux; Trevor H Worthy
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Bradley C Livezey; Richard L Zusi
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.286

5.  Hypocrea britdaniae and H. foliicola: two remarkable new European species.

Authors:  Walter M Jaklitsch; Hermann Voglmayr
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Disentangling the Trichoderma viridescens complex.

Authors:  W M Jaklitsch; G J Samuels; A Ismaiel; H Voglmayr
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 11.051

7.  Reproductive biology and its impact on body size: comparative analysis of mammalian, avian and dinosaurian reproduction.

Authors:  Jan Werner; Eva Maria Griebeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The avian fossil record in Insular Southeast Asia and its implications for avian biogeography and palaeoecology.

Authors:  Hanneke J M Meijer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Choosing and using introns in molecular phylogenetics.

Authors:  Simon Creer
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 1.625

10.  Waves of genomic hitchhikers shed light on the evolution of gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes).

Authors:  Jan Ole Kriegs; Andreas Matzke; Gennady Churakov; Andrej Kuritzin; Gerald Mayr; Jürgen Brosius; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.