Literature DB >> 12099567

A new method for attenuation coefficient measurement in the liver: comparison with the spectral shift central frequency method.

Yasutomo Fujii1, Nobuyuki Taniguchi, Kouichi Itoh, Kouichiro Shigeta, Yi Wang, Jing-Wen Tsao, Kenji Kumasaki, Takashi Itoh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a new method of measuring the attenuation coefficient in the liver, which offers less variability of results than the conventional method.
METHODS: The attenuation coefficient was evaluated on the basis of the following equation with sound field correction: [log(M0 (z)) - tau(z)]. In our system, the attenuation coefficient was also evaluated by the spectral shift central frequency method at the same time. We used 44 cases of normal liver, 40 cases of fatty liver, and 20 cases of cirrhotic liver in the system.
RESULTS: With this new method, attenuation coefficient values were 0.59+/-0.10 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1) in normal livers, 0.80+/-0.12 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1) in fatty livers, and 0.62+/-0.09 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1) in cirrhotic livers. In both methods we recorded a statistically significant difference between normal and fatty livers and between fatty and cirrhotic livers (P < .0001). Only in the fatty liver was any significant difference (P < .0001) found between attenuation coefficients in the new method and those in the spectral shift central frequency method (0.70+/-0.05 dB x cm(-1) x MHz(-1)).
CONCLUSIONS: This new method, which was more sensitive in detecting fatty infiltration than the spectral shift central frequency method, was considered usable for evaluating the attenuation coefficient of the liver in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12099567     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.7.783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  15 in total

1.  Characterizing acoustic attenuation of homogeneous media using focused impulsive acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kristin D Frinkley; Katherine G Oldenburg; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Frame rate considerations for real-time abdominal acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Brian J Fahey; Mark L Palmeri; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Processed skin surface images acquired by acoustic impedance difference imaging using the ultrasonic interference method: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yasutomo Fujii; Masasumi Yoshizawa; Ryuji Emoto; Naoto Haruyama; Takasuke Irie; Nobuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Spectral analysis framework for compressed sensing ultrasound signals.

Authors:  Jaeyoon Shim; Don Hur; Hyungsuk Kim
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Fine-tuning the H-scan for discriminating changes in tissue scatterers.

Authors:  Kevin J Parker; Jihye Baek
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-05-20

6.  Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Goutam Ghoshal; Alexander D Pawlicki; Ernest L Madsen; Roberto J Lavarello; Michael L Oelze; James A Zagzebski; William D O'Brien; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasound attenuation measurements using a reference phantom with sound speed mismatch.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Nicholas C Rubert; Ernest L Madsen; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.578

9.  Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Kibo Nam; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.

Authors:  Haidy Gerges Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.