Literature DB >> 12098405

Legal vulnerability of assessment tools.

Michael Tweed1, Jose Miola.   

Abstract

Legal challenges relating to assessment results are increasing around the world. Until recently such challenges were not possible in the UK. With changes to the law, including the Human Rights Act, it is now possible for an Examining Body to have its assessment process challenged. Defending an assessment tool is potentially easy but not being prepared could lead to embarrassing defeat, with significant costs and damages to pay. Judgement may be made as to what constitutes appropriate methods of evaluating and the levels that assessments must attain. There are more questions than answers as to what will happen and who will be the true beneficiaries of potential and real challenges.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12098405     DOI: 10.1080/014215901300353922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  6 in total

1.  Improving reliability of a residency interview process.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Michelle L Serres; Todd E Gundrum
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Metrics in medical education.

Authors:  Paul McCoubrie
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2010-05

3.  Providing Validation Evidence for a Clinical-Science Module: Improving Testing Reliability with Quizzes.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; M Kenneth Cor; Erik D Maki
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Joining the dots: conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson; Mike J Tweed; Tony G Egan; Anthony N Ali; Jan M McKenzie; MaryLeigh Moore; Joy R Rudland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?

Authors:  Mike Tweed; Tim Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?

Authors:  Aileen Faherty; Tim Counihan; Thomas Kropmans; Yvonne Finn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.