Literature DB >> 12098040

Computer-generated trauma management plans: comparison with actual care.

John R Clarke1, Catherine Z Hayward, Thomas A Santora, David K Wagner, Bonnie L Webber.   

Abstract

TraumAID is a computer-based decision aid that uses decision rules and logical deduction to generate management plans for the initial definitive management of injured patients; its use is currently confined to assessing penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries in nonpregnant adults. These management plans were compared to trauma center care in an American urban medical school hospital. The TraumAID program was available to trauma chief residents for patient care during the "golden hour." Resulting changes in plans were documented by the residents. For 15 months the management plans for all applicable patients were documented serially, as were computer plans and outcomes. The sequential care and computer-generated care plans were then blinded and judged by three other trauma surgeons as to acceptability and preference. A consecutive series of 97 patients was evaluated. The residents used the computer for 40 cases during patient care. In 5 of the 40 cases, they altered their evaluation, diagnosis, or treatment; in none of these 5 was the alteration judged an error. Of the 97 patients, 10 had adverse outcomes, 2 of which were judged potentially avoidable, with unacceptable errors in management. TraumAID's plans were acceptable for both. In 31 cases previously managed by the judges themselves, the TraumAID plans were preferred by the judge to the care he or she had provided, by a ratio of 25:6 (p < 0.01). In a preliminary assessment, computer-generated, patient-specific protocols for the acute management of injuries were preferred to actual care previously given by the judges themselves and were associated with improved care and potential improvement in outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12098040     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0263-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  2 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence: a computerized decision aid for trauma.

Authors:  J R Clarke; D P Cebula; B L Webber
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1988-08

2.  On-line quality [corrected] assurance in the initial definitive management of multiple trauma: evaluating system potential.

Authors:  A S Gertner; B L Webber; J R Clarke; C Z Hayward; T A Santora; D K Wagner
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.326

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Use of description logic classification to reason about consequences of penetrating injuries.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Olivier Dameron; Mark A Musen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Using video audit to improve trauma resuscitation--time for a new approach.

Authors:  Mark Fitzgerald; Rob Gocentas; Linas Dziukas; Peter Cameron; Colin Mackenzie; Nathan Farrow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  A Data-driven Process Recommender Framework.

Authors:  Sen Yang; Xin Dong; Leilei Sun; Yichen Zhou; Richard A Farneth; Hui Xiong; Randall S Burd; Ivan Marsic
Journal:  KDD       Date:  2017-08

4.  Process Mining for Trauma Resuscitation.

Authors:  Sen Yang; Jingyuan Li; Xiaoyi Tang; Shuhong Chen; Ivan Marsic; Randall S Burd
Journal:  IEEE Intell Inform Bull       Date:  2017-08

5.  A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Ji; Rebecca Smith; Toan Huynh; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A scoping review.

Authors:  Abirami Kirubarajan; Ahmed Taher; Shawn Khan; Sameer Masood
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-11-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.