Literature DB >> 12095253

Evolution of enzymes in metabolism: a network perspective.

Rui Alves1, Raphael A G Chaleil, Michael J E Sternberg.   

Abstract

Several models have been proposed to explain the origin and evolution of enzymes in metabolic pathways. Initially, the retro-evolution model proposed that, as enzymes at the end of pathways depleted their substrates in the primordial soup, there was a pressure for earlier enzymes in pathways to be created, using the later ones as initial template, in order to replenish the pools of depleted metabolites. Later, the recruitment model proposed that initial templates from other pathways could be used as long as those enzymes were similar in chemistry or substrate specificity. These two models have dominated recent studies of enzyme evolution. These studies are constrained by either the small scale of the study or the artificial restrictions imposed by pathway definitions. Here, a network approach is used to study enzyme evolution in fully sequenced genomes, thus removing both constraints. We find that homologous pairs of enzymes are roughly twice as likely to have evolved from enzymes that are less than three steps away from each other in the reaction network than pairs of non-homologous enzymes. These results, together with the conservation of the type of chemical reaction catalyzed by evolutionarily related enzymes, suggest that functional blocks of similar chemistry have evolved within metabolic networks. One possible explanation for these observations is that this local evolution phenomenon is likely to cause less global physiological disruptions in metabolism than evolution of enzymes from other enzymes that are distant from them in the metabolic network. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12095253     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00546-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  21 in total

1.  Pathway length and evolutionary constraint in amino acid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Matthew T Rutter; Rebecca A Zufall
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Origins of specificity and promiscuity in metabolic networks.

Authors:  Pablo Carbonell; Guillaume Lecointre; Jean-Loup Faulon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Trade-offs between efficiency and robustness in bacterial metabolic networks are associated with niche breadth.

Authors:  Melissa J Morine; Hong Gu; Ransom A Myers; Joseph P Bielawski
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The organization of the microbial biodegradation network from a systems-biology perspective.

Authors:  Florencio Pazos; Alfonso Valencia; Víctor De Lorenzo
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Evolution of biomolecular networks: lessons from metabolic and protein interactions.

Authors:  Takuji Yamada; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  microRNA evolution in a human transcription factor and microRNA regulatory network.

Authors:  Chengxiang Qiu; Juan Wang; Pengying Yao; Edwin Wang; Qinghua Cui
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-06-29

7.  A global evolutionary and metabolic analysis of human obesity gene risk variants.

Authors:  Joseph J Castillo; Zachary S Hazlett; Robert A Orlando; William S Garver
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Structural correlations in bacterial metabolic networks.

Authors:  Sebastian Bernhardsson; Philip Gerlee; Ludvig Lizana
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Horizontal and vertical growth of S. cerevisiae metabolic network.

Authors:  Luigi Grassi; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Preferential attachment in the evolution of metabolic networks.

Authors:  Sara Light; Per Kraulis; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.