Literature DB >> 12094928

Evaluation of the NIOSH draft method 5525 for determination of the total reactive isocyanate group (TRIG) for aliphatic isocyanates in autobody repair shops. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

D Bello1, R P Streicher, S R Woskie.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of the NIOSH draft method 5525 for analysis of monomeric and TRIG aliphatic isocyanates in autobody repair shops. It was found that an optimized pH gradient enhanced noticeably the resolution and, therefore, identification of aliphatic isocyanates. Samples proved to be very stable for at least a year when stored at -13 degrees C in the freezer, and no major stability problems were found for the MAP reagent. The detector response factor RSD for selected MAP ureas was 40% in the fluorescence (FLD), 3% in the UV at 254 nm (UV254), and 1% in the UV at 370 nm (UV370). The mean FLD/UV254 and UV254/UV370 detector response ratios of standards were 31.7 (RSD = 37.8) and 17.1 (RSD = 5.4), respectively. The FLD/UV254 ratio in bulks varied from 0.41 to 1.97 times the HDI monomer ratio. The mean UV254/UV370 ratio in bulks was 16.1 (range 14.1 to 19.2, N = 38). Mean (range) recovery of 92 (91.2-93.2)% was found for the N3300 (isocyanurate) spiked on 25 mm quartz fiber filters in the range 0.07 to 2.2 microg NCO ml(-1). Mean (range) recovery for impingers was 100.7 (91.7-106.0)% for N3300 in the concentration range of 0.018 to 2.5 microg NCO ml(-1) and 81.0 (76.1-89.1)% for IPDI in the concentration range of 0.016 to 1.87 microg NCO ml(-1). Analytical method precision was 3.4% and mean bias 7.4% (range = 0-25%). The NIOSH draft method 5525 provides flexibility, enhanced sensitivity and specificity, powerful resolution, and very small compound-to-compound variability in the UV254, resulting in a more reliable identification and quantification of aliphatic isocyanates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12094928     DOI: 10.1039/b110613a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  5 in total

1.  Indoor air pollution evaluation with emphasize on HDI and biological assessment of HDA in the polyurethane factories.

Authors:  Mirtaghi Mirmohammadi; M Hakimi Ibrahim; Anees Ahmad; Mohd Omar Abdul Kadir; M Mohammadyan; S B Mirashrafi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Skin exposure to aliphatic polyisocyanates in the auto body repair and refinishing industry: III. A personal exposure algorithm.

Authors:  Youcheng Liu; Meredith H Stowe; Dhimiter Bello; Judy Sparer; Rebecca J Gore; Mark R Cullen; Carrie A Redlich; Susan R Woskie
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2008-11-14

3.  Evaluation of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate as an indoor air pollutant and biological assessment of methylene dianiline in the polyurethane factories.

Authors:  Mirtaghi Mirmohammadi; M Hakimi Ibrahim; Anees Ahmad; Mohd Omar Abdul Kadir; M Mohammadyan; S B Mirashrafi
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-04

4.  Polymeric coatings that mimic the endothelium: combining nitric oxide release with surface-bound active thrombomodulin and heparin.

Authors:  Biyun Wu; Bruce Gerlitz; Brian W Grinnell; Mark E Meyerhoff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Modeling of hexamethylene diisocyanate and psychrometric parameters and other effective factors in the polyurethane factories.

Authors:  Mirtaghi Mirmohammadi; M H Ibrahim; J N Saraji
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.