Literature DB >> 12093650

Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders.

Luca Ilari1, Sheraz M Daya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term outcome of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders.
DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients (23 eyes) with severe ocular surface disorders. INTERVENTION: Thirty-three KLAL procedures were performed. Ten patients (10 eyes) underwent KLAL in combination with other surgical procedures. Oral or topical cyclosporine or both were used after surgery in 15 patients to prevent allograft rejection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reconstruction of the ocular surface with restoration of phenotypic corneal epithelium, reduction of corneal vascularization and conjunctivalization, decreased pain, and visual improvement.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 60 months (range, 15-96 months). Eight eyes (24.2%) never reepithelialized and were considered primary failures. The remaining 25 grafts initially restored a phenotypic corneal epithelium, but at last follow-up only 7 (21.2%) were stable. Graft survival rate was 54.4% at 1 year, 33.3% at 2 years, and 27.3% at 3 years. Visual acuity improved or was unchanged in 19 eyes (82.6%) and decreased in 4 eyes (17.4%). Seventeen corneal transplantations (3 lamellar keratoplasties and 14 penetrating keratoplasties) were performed either in combination with or after a KLAL. All three lamellar keratoplasties were successful, whereas 13 of the 14 penetrating keratoplasties failed. Cyclosporine was used initially in high-risk recipients and later in all recipients. Allograft rejection episodes occurred in 13 KLAL procedures of 11 eyes (39.4%) and were more common in patients treated with cyclosporine compared with the untreated group (87.5% vs. 22.2%). Graft survival was longer in the cyclosporine-treated group compared with the untreated group.
CONCLUSIONS: Keratolimbal allograft is useful in ocular surface reconstruction and restores phenotypic corneal epithelium. Graft survival rate, however, decreases dramatically over a 2-year period. Long-term use of cyclosporine appears to prolong graft survival but does not prevent acute allograft rejections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12093650     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  37 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of Limbal Stem Cell Transplant: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qihua Le; Tulika Chauhan; Madeline Yung; Chi-Hong Tseng; Sophie X Deng
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Epithelial proliferative potential of organ cultured corneoscleral rims; implications for allo-limbal transplantation and eye banking.

Authors:  V A Shanmuganathan; A P Rotchford; A B Tullo; A Joseph; I Zambrano; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Development of a cell sheet transportation technique for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Yoshinori Oie; Takayuki Nozaki; Hiroshi Takayanagi; Susumu Hara; Ryuhei Hayashi; Shizu Takeda; Keisuke Mori; Noboru Moriya; Takeshi Soma; Motokazu Tsujikawa; Kazuo Saito; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Long-term outcome and prognostic factor analysis for keratolimbal allografts.

Authors:  Eui Seok Han; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Partial lamellar keratoplasty for peripheral corneal disease using a graft from the glycerin-preserved corneoscleral rim.

Authors:  Hua Gao; Xiuxian Wang; Jose J Echegaray; Suxia Li; Ting Wang; Weiyun Shi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  3D Microfabricated Scaffolds and Microfluidic Devices for Ocular Surface Replacement: a Review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Prina; Pritesh Mistry; Laura E Sidney; Jing Yang; Ricky D Wildman; Marina Bertolin; Claudia Breda; Barbara Ferrari; Vanessa Barbaro; Andrew Hopkinson; Harminder S Dua; Stefano Ferrari; Felicity R A J Rose
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Plasma polymer-coated contact lenses for the culture and transfer of corneal epithelial cells in the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Karl David Brown; Suet Low; Indumathi Mariappan; Keren Maree Abberton; Robert Short; Hong Zhang; Savitri Maddileti; Virender Sangwan; David Steele; Mark Daniell
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Update on limbal stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Pejman Bakhtiari; Ali Djalilian
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

9.  Limbal stem cell transplantation: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2008-10-01

10.  Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival.

Authors:  Medi Eslani; Zeeshan Haq; Asadolah Movahedan; Adam Moss; Alireza Baradaran-Rafii; Gautham Mogilishetty; Edward J Holland; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.