Literature DB >> 12092674

Health care report cards: implications for vulnerable patient groups and the organizations providing them care.

Huw T O Davies1, A Eugene Washington, Andrew B Bindman.   

Abstract

Standardized public reporting on the quality of health care (report cards) offers an opportunity to empower purchasers and consumers so that they can make choices that can result in better health care for less money. However, not all population subgroups are equally well served by the publication of such data. In particular, vulnerable patient groups such as the poor, the less educated, the chronically sick, and members of ethnic or linguistic minorities may find issues of importance to them largely neglected. In addition, the way that report card data are collected, analyzed, and presented may further marginalize the experiences of these groups who in any case are already underserved by the health system. This observation also has important implications for health care providers who serve primarily large numbers of vulnerable patients. The differential impacts of report card data on vulnerable patient groups (and their providers) need to be addressed by researchers and policy makers if access issues are not to be damaged further by the providers' pursuit of quality and value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12092674     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-27-3-379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  11 in total

1.  Primary care in the United States: profiling performance in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  Norbert Goldfield; Shamini Gnani; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

2.  Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls.

Authors:  A E Powell; H T O Davies; R G Thomson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

3. 

Authors:  Nelson Varas-Díaz; Torsten B Neilands; Vincent Guilamo-Ramos; Francheska N Cintrón Bou
Journal:  Rev Puertorriquena Psicol       Date:  2008

4.  Evidence into policy and practice? Measuring the progress of U.S. and U.K. policies to tackle disparities and inequalities in U.S. and U.K. health and health care.

Authors:  Mark Exworthy; Andrew Bindman; Huw Davies; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Development of an information source for patients and the public about general practice services: an action research study.

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Jenny Noble; Helen Davies; Heather Waterman; Kieran Walshe; Rod Sheaff; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  [EXPERIENCES RELATED TO AN INTERVENTION TO REDUCE STIGMA RELATED TO HIV / AIDS AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS IN PUERTO RICO].

Authors:  Francheska Cintrón-Bou; Nelson Varas-Díaz; Melissa Marzán-Rodríguez; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  Interam J Psychol       Date:  2016

7.  Development and validation of a culturally appropriate HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale for Puerto Rican health professionals in training.

Authors:  Nelson Varas-Díaz; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2009-10

8.  Beyond negative attitudes: Examining HIV/AIDS stigma behaviors in clinical encounters.

Authors:  Nelson Varas-Díaz; Marinilda Rivera; Eliut Rivera-Segarra; Torsten B Neilands; Nerian Ortiz; Yasmín Pedrogo; Sigrid Mendoza; Andrés Rivera Amador; Stephanie Martínez García; Sugeily Rivera Suazo; Carmen E Albizu-García
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2017-05-03

9.  A qualitative study of choosing home health care after hospitalization: the unintended consequences of 'patient choice' requirements.

Authors:  Rosa R Baier; Andrea Wysocki; Stefan Gravenstein; Emily Cooper; Vincent Mor; Melissa Clark
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Influence of patients' socioeconomic status on clinical management decisions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Susannah M Bernheim; Joseph S Ross; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.